Impact of petrophysical uncertainty on Bayesian hydrogeophysical inversion and model selection

被引:24
作者
Brunetti, Carlotta [1 ]
Linde, Niklas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne, Inst Earth Sci, Appl & Environm Geophys Grp, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Petrophysical uncertainty; Hydrogeophysics; Bayesian model selection; Bayesian inversion; Evidence; Conceptual model; BACTERIAL TRANSPORT SITE; JOINT INVERSION; ROCK-PHYSICS; SEISMIC DATA; HYDROLOGICAL DATA; TRAVEL-TIMES; TOMOGRAPHY; RESERVOIR; ELECTROMAGNETICS; RESISTIVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.11.028
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Quantitative hydrogeophysical studies rely heavily on petrophysical relationships that link geophysical properties to hydrogeological properties and state variables. Coupled inversion studies are frequently based on the questionable assumption that these relationships are perfect (i.e., no scatter). Using synthetic examples and crosshole ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data from the South Oyster Bacterial Transport Site in Virginia, USA, we investigate the impact of spatially-correlated petrophysical uncertainty on inferred posterior porosity and hydraulic conductivity distributions and on Bayes factors used in Bayesian model selection. Our study shows that accounting for petrophysical uncertainty in the inversion (I) decreases bias of the inferred variance of hydrogeological subsurface properties, (II) provides more realistic uncertainty assessment and (III) reduces the overconfidence in the ability of geophysical data to falsify conceptual hydrogeological models.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 359
页数:14
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2007, SEISMIC RESERVOIR CH
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1964, Monte Carlo Methods, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-5819-7
  • [3] The optimization approach to lithological tomography: Combining seismic data and petrophysics for porosity prediction
    Bosch, M
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2004, 69 (05) : 1272 - 1282
  • [4] Lithologic tomography: From plural geophysical data to lithology estimation
    Bosch, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1999, 104 (B1) : 749 - 766
  • [5] Bosch M, 2016, GEOPHYS MONOGR SER, V218, P29
  • [6] Petrophysical seismic inversion conditioned to well-log data: Methods and application to a gas reservoir
    Bosch, Miguel
    Carvajal, Carla
    Rodrigues, Juan
    Torres, Astrid
    Aldana, Milagrosa
    Sierra, Jesus
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2009, 74 (02) : O1 - O15
  • [7] Bayesian model selection in hydrogeophysics: Application to conceptual subsurface models of the South Oyster Bacterial Transport Site, Virginia, USA
    Brunetti, Carlotta
    Linde, Niklas
    Vrugt, Jasper A.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2017, 102 : 127 - 141
  • [8] Learning about physical parameters: the importance of model discrepancy
    Brynjarsdottir, Jenny
    O'Hagan, Anthony
    [J]. INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2014, 30 (11)
  • [9] Development of a joint hydrogeophysical inversion approach and application to a contaminated fractured aquifer
    Chen, J.
    Hubbard, S.
    Peterson, J.
    Williams, K.
    Fienen, M.
    Jardine, P.
    Watson, D.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2006, 42 (06)
  • [10] Effects of uncertainty in rock-physics models on reservoir parameter estimation using seismic amplitude variation with angle and controlled-source electromagnetics data
    Chen, Jinsong
    Dickens, Thomas A.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2009, 57 (01) : 61 - 74