Prediction Models for Suicide Attempts and Deaths: A Systematic Review and Simulation

被引:347
作者
Belsher, Bradley E. [1 ,2 ]
Smolenski, Derek J. [1 ]
Pruitt, Larry D. [1 ]
Bush, Nigel E. [1 ]
Beech, Erin H. [1 ]
Workman, Don E. [1 ,2 ]
Morgan, Rebecca L. [3 ]
Evatt, Daniel P. [1 ,2 ]
Tucker, Jennifer [1 ]
Skopp, Nancy A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Def Hlth Agcy, Psychol Hlth Ctr Excellence, Silver Spring, MD USA
[2] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
ASSESS RISK; RESILIENCE; BEHAVIORS; MACHINE; ARMY; METAANALYSIS; PREVENTION; REGRESSION; VETERANS; IDEATION;
D O I
10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0174
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
ImportanceSuicide prediction models have the potential to improve the identification of patients at heightened suicide risk by using predictive algorithms on large-scale data sources. Suicide prediction models are being developed for use across enterprise-level health care systems including the US Department of Defense, US Department of Veterans Affairs, and Kaiser Permanente. ObjectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of suicide prediction models in predicting suicide and suicide attempts and to simulate the effects of implementing suicide prediction models using population-level estimates of suicide rates. Evidence ReviewA systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify research evaluating the predictive accuracy of suicide prediction models in identifying patients at high risk for a suicide attempt or death by suicide. Each database was searched from inception to August 21, 2018. The search strategy included search terms for suicidal behavior, risk prediction, and predictive modeling. Reference lists of included studies were also screened. Two reviewers independently screened and evaluated eligible studies. FindingsFrom a total of 7306 abstracts reviewed, 17 cohort studies met the inclusion criteria, representing 64 unique prediction models across 5 countries with more than 14 million participants. The research quality of the included studies was generally high. Global classification accuracy was good (>= 0.80 in most models), while the predictive validity associated with a positive result for suicide mortality was extremely low (<= 0.01 in most models). Simulations of the results suggest very low positive predictive values across a variety of population assessment characteristics. Conclusions and RelevanceTo date, suicide prediction models produce accurate overall classification models, but their accuracy of predicting a future event is near 0. Several critical concerns remain unaddressed, precluding their readiness for clinical applications across health systems.
引用
收藏
页码:642 / 651
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[31]   Decision making about healthcare-related tests and diagnostic test strategies. Paper 2: a review of methodological and practical challenges [J].
Mustafa, Reem A. ;
Wiercioch, Wojtek ;
Cheung, Adrienne ;
Prediger, Barbara ;
Brozek, Jan ;
Bossuyt, Patrick ;
Garg, Amit X. ;
Lelgemann, Monika ;
Bueehler, Diedrich ;
Schunemann, Holger J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 92 :18-28
[32]   Suicide Risk Assessment and Prevention: A Systematic Review Focusing on Veterans [J].
Nelson, Heidi D. ;
Denneson, Lauren M. ;
Low, Allison R. ;
Bauer, Brian W. ;
O'Neil, Maya ;
Kansagara, Devan ;
Teo, Alan R. .
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2017, 68 (10) :1003-1015
[33]   Risk Factors for the Transition from Suicide Ideation to Suicide Attempt: Results from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS) [J].
Nock, Matthew K. ;
Millner, Alexander J. ;
Joiner, Thomas E. ;
Gutierrez, Peter M. ;
Han, Georges ;
Hwang, Irving ;
King, Andrew ;
Naifeh, James A. ;
Sampson, Nancy A. ;
Zaslavsky, Alan M. ;
Stein, Murray B. ;
Ursano, Robert J. ;
Kessler, Ronald C. .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 127 (02) :139-149
[34]  
POKORNY AD, 1983, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V40, P249
[35]  
Pruitt L.D., 2017, Department of Defense Suicide Event Report: CY 2015 Annual Report
[36]  
Pruitt L.D., 2016, Department of Defense suicide event report (DODSER): Calendar year 2014 annual report
[37]   Instruments for the assessment of suicide risk: A systematic review evaluating the certainty of the evidence [J].
Runeson, Bo ;
Odeberg, Jenny ;
Pettersson, Agneta ;
Edbom, Tobias ;
Adamsson, Ingalill Jildevik ;
Waern, Margda .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (07)
[38]   Predictors of Suicide and Accident Death in the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS) Results From the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS) [J].
Schoenbaum, Michael ;
Kessler, Ronald C. ;
Gilman, Stephen E. ;
Colpe, Lisa J. ;
Heeringa, Steven G. ;
Stein, Murray B. ;
Ursano, Robert J. ;
Cox, Kenneth L. .
JAMA PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 71 (05) :493-503
[39]  
Simon GE, 2018, AM J PSYCHIAT, V175, P434, DOI [10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17080844, 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17101167]
[40]   Diagnosing tests: Using and misusing diagnostic and screening tests [J].
Streiner, DL .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2003, 81 (03) :209-219