Public Understanding of Synthetic Biology

被引:42
作者
Pauwels, Eleonore [1 ]
机构
[1] Woodrow Wilson Int Ctr Scholars, Synthet Biol Project, Sci & Technol Innovat Program, Washington, DC 20560 USA
关键词
synthetic biology; public perceptions; framing; risk-benefit trade-off; application; BIOTECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGIES; PERCEPTIONS; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1525/bio.2013.63.2.4
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The objective of this article is not to draw exhaustive conclusions about public perceptions of synthetic biology but to provide readers with an integrated review of the findings from 4 years of quantitative and qualitative research conducted On this subject in the United States. US public perceptions toward synthetic biology are ambivalent. Members of the public show enthusiasm for synthetic biology applications when those applications are developed to address societal, medical, and sustainability needs, whereas engineering biology is seen as a potential concern if this research is done without investigations of its potential risks and long-term implications. Members of the public also support funding for research that leads to applications that actually meet social and sustainability goals. When it comes to oversight, their priorities are to promote transparency and accountability and to ensure a form of tailored governance in which diverse knowledge sources help address the uncertainty surrounding new technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 89
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, NanoEthics, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11569-010-0095-6
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, NAN SYNTH BIOL PUBL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, 22700 EUR EUR COMM
[4]  
Ball P., 2011, Nature
[5]   Public knowledge of and attitudes to science: Alternative measures that may end the "science war" [J].
Bauer, MW ;
Petkova, K ;
Boyadjieva, P .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2000, 25 (01) :30-51
[6]  
Bedau Mark A, 2009, Syst Synth Biol, V3, P65, DOI 10.1007/s11693-009-9039-2
[7]   Enhancing consumer acceptance of new processing technologies [J].
Bruhn, Christine M. .
INNOVATIVE FOOD SCIENCE & EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2007, 8 (04) :555-558
[8]  
Carlson RobertH., 2010, Biology is Technology: The Promise, Peril, and New Business of Engineering Life
[9]   Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust [J].
Cobb, MD ;
Macoubrie, J .
JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 2004, 6 (04) :395-405
[10]  
Davies S.R., 2010, Nanoethics, V4, P141, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11569-010-0096-5