The Current State and Future of Factor Analysis in Personality Disorder Research

被引:35
作者
Wright, Aidan G. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
exploratory factor analysis; confirmatory factor analysis; exploratory structural equation modeling; multilevel structural equation modeling; P-technique factor analysis; BORDERLINE PERSONALITY; 5-FACTOR MODEL; PATHOLOGICAL PERSONALITY; MENTAL-DISORDERS; TRAIT MODEL; HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURE; AFFECTIVE INSTABILITY; ABNORMAL-PERSONALITY; LATENT CLASS; PART I;
D O I
10.1037/per0000216
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The major debates in the personality disorder (PD) field center on the structure of personality pathology. Factor analysis is designed to elucidate the underlying structure of observed phenomena. Therefore, factor analysis has already played a major role in the debates about the structure of PD, and will continue to be an often-used and indispensable tool moving forward. However, misconceptions about the utility and interpretation of factor analyses abound. The purpose of this article is to provide a conceptual primer on available factor analytic techniques and how they have been applied in PD research, and to highlight novel ways of using factor analysis moving forward. The techniques reviewed include exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, exploratory structural equation modeling, multilevel structural equation modeling, and person-specific (i.e., P-technique) factor analysis. Additionally, the notion that exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic approaches lie on an exploratory to confirmatory spectrum is introduced. Examples from the published literature are used to illustrate key points.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 25
页数:12
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association A. Association A.P, 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, DOI [DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596, DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596.744053]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Foundations of factor analysis
[3]  
[Anonymous], PURD S PSYC IN PRESS
[4]   Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling [J].
Asparouhov, Tihomir ;
Muthen, Bengt .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2009, 16 (03) :397-438
[5]   THE STRUCTURE OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS: COMPARING THE DSM-IV-TR AXIS II CLASSIFICATION WITH THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL FRAMEWORK USING STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING [J].
Bastiaansen, Leen ;
Rossi, Gina ;
Schotte, Christiaan ;
De Fruyt, Filip .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2011, 25 (03) :378-396
[6]   Bridging the Nomothetic and Idiographic Approaches to the Analysis of Clinical Data [J].
Beltz, Adriene M. ;
Wright, Aidan G. C. ;
Sprague, Briana N. ;
Molenaar, Peter C. M. .
ASSESSMENT, 2016, 23 (04) :447-458
[7]   Toward a Model for Assessing Level of Personality Functioning in DSM-5, Part I: A Review of Theory and Methods [J].
Bender, Donna S. ;
Morey, Leslie C. ;
Skodol, Andrew E. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2011, 93 (04) :332-346
[8]   Higher-order dimensions of personality disorder: Hierarchical structure and relationships with the five-factor model, the interpersonal circle, and psychopathy [J].
Blackburn, R ;
Logan, C ;
Renwick, SJD ;
Donnelly, JP .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2005, 19 (06) :597-623
[9]   Structure of the DSM-IV Personality disorders as revealed in clinician ratings [J].
Blais, Mark A. ;
Malone, Johanna C. .
COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 54 (04) :326-333
[10]  
Brown T. A., 2015, Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, V2nd ed., DOI DOI 10.19030/AJBE.V6I3.7818