A new approach to the analysis and evaluation of the research output of countries and institutions

被引:16
作者
Docampo, Domingo [1 ]
Bessoule, Jean-Jacques [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vigo, atlanTTic Res Ctr Commun Technol, Campus Univ, Vigo 36310, Spain
[2] Univ Bordeaux, CNRS, Lab Biogenese Membranaire, UMR 5200,INRA Bordeaux Aquitaine, Batiment A3,71 Ave Edouard Bourlaux,CS 20032, F-33140 Villenave Dornon, France
关键词
Research output; Bibliometric indicators; Countries; Institutions; Publications; Citations; PERFORMANCE; INDICATORS; RANKING; INDEX;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-019-03089-w
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
A plethora of bibliometric indicators is available nowadays to gauge research performance. The spectrum of bibliometric based measures is very broad, from purely size-dependent indicators (e.g. raw counts of scientific contributions and/or citations) up to size-independent measures (e.g. citations per paper, publications or citations per researcher), through a number of indicators that effectively combine quantitative and qualitative features (e.g. the h-index). In this paper we present a straightforward procedure to evaluate the scientific contribution of territories and institutions that combines size-dependent and scale-free measures. We have analysed in the paper the scientific production of 189 countries in the period 2006-2015. Our approach enables effective global and field-related comparative analyses of the scientific productions of countries and academic/research institutions. Furthermore, the procedure helps to identifying strengths and weaknesses of a given country or institution, by tracking variations of performance ratios across research fields. Moreover, by using a straightforward wealth-index, we show how research performance measures are highly associated with the wealth of countries and territories. Given the simplicity of the methods introduced in this paper and the fact that their results are easily understandable by non-specialists, we believe they could become a useful tool for the assessment of the research output of countries and institutions.
引用
收藏
页码:1207 / 1225
页数:19
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] ABRAMO C, 2016, J INFORMETR, V10, P2, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JOI.2016.04.006
  • [2] Ranking national research systems by citation indicators. A comparative analysis using whole and fractionalised counting methods
    Aksnes, Dag W.
    Schneider, Jesper W.
    Gunnarsson, Magnus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2012, 6 (01) : 36 - 43
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP E
  • [4] Macro-Indicators of Citation Impacts of Six Prolific Countries: InCites Data and the Statistical Significance of Trends
    Bornmann, Lutz
    Leydesdorff, Loet
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (02):
  • [5] q2-Index: Quantitative and qualitative evaluation based on the number and impact of papers in the Hirsch core
    Cabrerizo, F. J.
    Alonso, S.
    Herrera-Viedma, E.
    Herrera, F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2010, 4 (01) : 23 - 28
  • [6] Clarivate Analytics, 2017, CLAR AN WEB SCI CIT
  • [7] Clarivate Analytics, 2018, ESS SCIENCEHIGHLY CI
  • [8] Clarivate Analytics, 2018, INCITES IND HDB
  • [9] Theory and practise of the g-index
    Egghe, Leo
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2006, 69 (01) : 131 - 152
  • [10] European Commission, 2013, COUNTR REG SCI PROD