Development and validation of an optimized prediction of mortality for candidates awaiting liver transplantation

被引:94
作者
Bertsimas, Dimitris [1 ]
Kung, Jerry [1 ]
Trichakis, Nikolaos [1 ]
Wang, Yuchen [1 ]
Hirose, Ryutaro [2 ]
Vagefi, Parsia A. [3 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Operat Res Ctr, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Surg, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
ethics and public policy; liver transplantation; hepatology; auxiliary; simulation; statistics; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; MELD; ALLOCATION; DELTA; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/ajt.15172
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Since 2002, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) has been used to rank liver transplant candidates. However, despite numerous revisions, MELD allocation still does not allow for equitable access to all waitlisted candidates. An optimized prediction of mortality (OPOM) was developed () utilizing machine-learning optimal classification tree models trained to predict a candidate's 3-month waitlist mortality or removal utilizing the Standard Transplant Analysis and Research (STAR) dataset. The Liver Simulated Allocation Model (LSAM) was then used to compare OPOM to MELD-based allocation. Out-of-sample area under the curve (AUC) was also calculated for candidate groups of increasing disease severity. OPOM allocation, when compared to MELD, reduced mortality on average by 417.96 (406.8-428.4) deaths every year in LSAM analysis. Improved survival was noted across all candidate demographics, diagnoses, and geographic regions. OPOM delivered a substantially higher AUC across all disease severity groups. OPOM more accurately and objectively prioritizes candidates for liver transplantation based on disease severity, allowing for more equitable allocation of livers with a resultant significant number of additional lives saved every year. These data demonstrate the potential of machine learning technology to help guide clinical practice, and potentially guide national policy.
引用
收藏
页码:1109 / 1118
页数:10
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Comparison of Liver Transplant-Related Survival Benefit in Patients With Versus Without Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the United States [J].
Berry, Kristin ;
Ioannou, George N. .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 149 (03) :669-680
[2]  
Bertsimas D, 2018, J MACHINE LEARNING R, V18, P1
[3]   Optimal classification trees [J].
Bertsimas, Dimitris ;
Dunn, Jack .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2017, 106 (07) :1039-1082
[4]  
Breiman L., 1984, BIOMETRICS, V1st ed.
[5]   Female liver transplant recipients with the same GFR as male recipients have lower MELD scores - A systematic bias [J].
Cholongitas, E. ;
Marelli, L. ;
Kerry, A. ;
Goodier, D. W. ;
Nair, D. ;
Thomas, M. ;
Patch, D. ;
Burroughs, A. K. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 7 (03) :685-692
[6]   Developing concepts on MELD: delta and cutoffs [J].
D'Amico, G .
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2005, 42 (06) :790-792
[7]   Machine Learning and the Profession of Medicine [J].
Darcy, Alison M. ;
Louie, Alan K. ;
Roberts, Laura Weiss .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 315 (06) :551-552
[8]  
Elwir Saleh, 2016, Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y), V12, P166
[9]   Mathematical models and behavior: Assessing delta MELD for liver allocation [J].
Freeman, RB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 (11) :1735-1736
[10]   Liver Simulated Allocation Modeling: Were the Predictions Accurate for Share 35? [J].
Goel, Aparna ;
Kim, W. Ray ;
Pyke, Joshua ;
Schladt, David P. ;
Kasiske, Bertram L. ;
Snyder, Jon J. ;
Lake, John R. ;
Israni, Ajay K. .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 102 (05) :769-774