Comparison of the International Committee of the Red Cross Foot With the Solid Ankle Cushion Heel Foot During Gait: A Randomized Double-Blind Study

被引:8
作者
Turcot, Katia [1 ,2 ]
Sagawa, Yoshimasa, Jr. [1 ,2 ]
Lacraz, Alain [3 ]
Lenoir, Jean [4 ]
Assal, Mathieu [5 ]
Armand, Stephane [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Geneva, Willy Taillard Lab Kinesiol, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
[2] Univ Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Univ Hosp Geneva, Div Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
[4] Lenoir Orthopaed, Geneva, Switzerland
[5] Clin Colline, Geneva, Switzerland
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2013年 / 94卷 / 08期
关键词
Amputees; Biomechanics; Gait; Kinetics; Red Cross; Rehabilitation; PROSTHETIC FEET; SACH; SEATTLE; AMPUTATION; AMPUTEES; ADULTS; WAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.019
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the well-recognized solid ankle cushion heel (SACH) foot with the prosthetic foot developed by the International Committee of the Red Cross (CR Equipements SACH) during gait. Design: Double-blind study was conducted to compare the influence on the biomechanics of gait of the CR Equipements SACH foot and the SACH foot. Setting: University hospital research center. Participants: Participants with unilateral transtibial amputation (N = 15) were included. Interventions: Three-dimensional motion analysis system and 2 forceplates were used to capture body motion and ground reaction forces during gait at a self-selected speed and at 1.2m/s. Main Outcome Measures: Nonparametric Wilcoxon matched-pairs tests were used to compare the 2 prosthetic feet with respect to their spatiotemporal (gait velocity, stride length, and percentage of stance phase), kinematic (range and peak angles of the pelvis, hip, knee, and ankle), and kinetic (peak moment and power of the hip, knee, and ankle) parameters. Results: Compared with the SACH foot, the CR Equipements SACH foot demonstrated a significantly greater stance phase symmetry ratio (SACH: 94% vs CR Equipements SACH: 97%), a more extensive ankle range of motion in the sagittal plane (SACH: 7 degrees vs CR Equipements SACH: 12 degrees), a greater maximal dorsiflexion angle during the terminal stance phase (SACH: 10 vs CR Equipements SACH: 13 degrees), and a higher ankle power (SACH: .31W/kg vs CR Equipements SACH: .40W/kg). No significant difference was found for the examined knee, hip, and pelvis parameters. Conclusions: The CR Equipements SACH foot provides more symmetry and improves ankle kinematics and kinetics in the sagittal plane compared with the SACH foot. This study suggests that individuals using the CR Equipements SACH foot improve their gait biomechanics compared when using the SACH foot. (c) 2013 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:1490 / 1497
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
ARYA AP, 1995, PROSTHET ORTHOT INT, V19, P37
[2]   Daily physical activity and heart rate response in people with a unilateral traumatic transtibial amputation [J].
Bussmann, Johannes B. ;
Schraulven, Hannelore J. ;
Stam, Henk J. .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2008, 89 (03) :430-434
[3]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond
[4]  
CULHAM EG, 1986, PROSTHET ORTHOT INT, V10, P15
[5]   A GAIT ANALYSIS DATA-COLLECTION AND REDUCTION TECHNIQUE [J].
DAVIS, RB ;
OUNPUU, S ;
TYBURSKI, D ;
GAGE, JR .
HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, 1991, 10 (05) :575-587
[6]   Transtibial amputees from the Vietnam War - Twenty-eight-year follow-up [J].
Dougherty, PJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2001, 83A (03) :383-389
[7]   Loading applied on prosthetic knee of transfemoral amputee: Comparison of inverse dynamics and direct measurements [J].
Dumas, R. ;
Cheze, L. ;
Frossard, L. .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2009, 30 (04) :560-562
[8]  
Ebrahimzadeh Mohammad H, 2007, J Foot Ankle Surg, V46, P429, DOI 10.1053/j.jfas.2007.08.011
[9]  
ENGLISH RD, 1995, J REHABIL RES DEV, V32, P32
[10]   The Amputee Mobility Predictor: An instrument to assess determinants of the lower-limb amputee's ability to ambulate [J].
Gailey, RS ;
Roach, KE ;
Applegate, EB ;
Cho, B ;
Cunniffe, B ;
Licht, S ;
Maguire, M ;
Nash, MS .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2002, 83 (05) :613-627