Robustness of chemometrics-based feature selection methods in early cancer detection and biomarker discovery

被引:9
|
作者
Lee, Hae Woo [1 ]
Lawton, Carl [1 ]
Na, Young Jeong [2 ]
Yoon, Seongkyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Chem Engn, Lowell, MA 01854 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
关键词
biomarker discovery; chemometrics; early detection; feature selection; omics; ovarian cancer; reproducibility; stability; CARLO CROSS-VALIDATION; SELDI-TOF MS; VARIABLE SELECTION; OVARIAN-CANCER; BREAST-CANCER; WAVELENGTH SELECTION; MULTIVARIATE CALIBRATION; MASS-SPECTROMETRY; SERUM BIOMARKERS; STABILITY;
D O I
10.1515/sagmb-2012-0067
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In omics studies aimed at the early detection and diagnosis of cancer, bioinformatics tools play a significant role when analyzing high dimensional, complex datasets, as well as when identifying a small set of biomarkers. However, in many cases, there are ambiguities in the robustness and the consistency of the discovered biomarker sets, since the feature selection methods often lead to irreproducible results. To address this, both the stability and the classification power of several chemometrics-based feature selection algorithms were evaluated using the Monte Carlo sampling technique, aiming at finding the most suitable feature selection methods for early cancer detection and biomarker discovery. To this end, two data sets were analyzed, which comprised of MALDI-TOF-MS and LC/TOF-MS spectra measured on serum samples in order to diagnose ovarian cancer. Using these datasets, the stability and the classification power of multiple feature subsets found by different feature selection methods were quantified by varying either the number of selected features, or the number of samples in the training set, with special emphasis placed on the property of stability. The results show that high consistency does not necessarily guarantee high predictive power. In addition, differences in the stability, as well as agreement in feature lists between several feature selection methods, depend on several factors, such as the number of available samples, feature sizes, quality of the information in the dataset, etc. Among the tested methods, only the variable importance in projection (VIP)-based method shows complementary properties, providing both highly consistent and accurate subsets of features. In addition, successive projection analysis (SPA) was excellent with regards to maintaining high stability over a wide range of experimental conditions. The stability of several feature selection methods is highly variable, stressing the importance of making the proper choice among feature selection methods. Therefore, rather than evaluating the selected features using only classification accuracy, stability measurements should be examined as well to improve the reliability of biomarker discovery.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 223
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Stable feature selection utilizing Graph Convolutional Neural Network and Layer-wise Relevance Propagation for biomarker discovery in breast cancer
    Chereda, Hryhorii
    Leha, Andreas
    Beissbarth, Tim
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2024, 151
  • [32] Morph-X-Select: Morphology-based tissue aptamer selection for ovarian cancer biomarker discovery
    Wang, Hongyu
    Li, Xin
    Volk, David E.
    Lokesh, Ganesh L. -R.
    Elizondo-Riojas, Miguel-Angel
    Li, Li
    Nick, Alpa M.
    Sood, Anil K.
    Rosenblatt, Kevin P.
    Gorenstein, David G.
    BIOTECHNIQUES, 2016, 61 (05) : 249 - 259
  • [33] Validation of a Biomarker Panel and Longitudinal Biomarker Performance for Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer
    Simmons, Archana R.
    Clarke, Charlotte H.
    Badgwell, Donna B.
    Lu, Zhen
    Sokoll, Lori J.
    Lu, Karen H.
    Zhang, Zhen
    Bast, Robert C., Jr.
    Skates, Steven J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2016, 26 (06) : 1070 - 1077
  • [34] Heat Map Based Feature Selection: A Case Study for Ovarian Cancer
    Huertas, Carlos
    Juarez-Ramirez, Reyes
    APPLICATIONS OF EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, EVOAPPLICATIONS 2015, 2015, 9028 : 3 - 13
  • [35] Cancer biomarker discovery: Opportunities and pitfalls in analytical methods
    Issaq, Haleem J.
    Waybright, Timothy J.
    Veenstra, Timothy D.
    ELECTROPHORESIS, 2011, 32 (09) : 967 - 975
  • [36] On the Adversarial Robustness of LASSO Based Feature Selection
    Li, Fuwei
    Lai, Lifeng
    Cui, Shuguang
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2021, 69 : 5555 - 5567
  • [37] Stable feature selection based on the ensemble L1-norm support vector machine for biomarker discovery
    Moon, Myungjin
    Nakai, Kenta
    BMC GENOMICS, 2016, 17
  • [38] DNA methylation in breast cancer: early detection and biomarker discovery through current and emerging approaches
    Melissa Hum
    Ann S. G. Lee
    Journal of Translational Medicine, 23 (1)
  • [39] Biomarker research with prospective study designs for the early detection of cancer
    Pesch, B.
    Breuning, T.
    Johnen, G.
    Casjens, S.
    Bonberg, N.
    Taeger, D.
    Mueller, A.
    Weber, D. G.
    Behrens, T.
    BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-PROTEINS AND PROTEOMICS, 2014, 1844 (05): : 874 - 883
  • [40] Phishing detection based on machine learning and feature selection methods
    Almseidin M.
    Abu Zuraiq A.M.
    Al-kasassbeh M.
    Alnidami N.
    International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 2019, 13 (12) : 71 - 183