Robustness of chemometrics-based feature selection methods in early cancer detection and biomarker discovery

被引:9
|
作者
Lee, Hae Woo [1 ]
Lawton, Carl [1 ]
Na, Young Jeong [2 ]
Yoon, Seongkyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Chem Engn, Lowell, MA 01854 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
关键词
biomarker discovery; chemometrics; early detection; feature selection; omics; ovarian cancer; reproducibility; stability; CARLO CROSS-VALIDATION; SELDI-TOF MS; VARIABLE SELECTION; OVARIAN-CANCER; BREAST-CANCER; WAVELENGTH SELECTION; MULTIVARIATE CALIBRATION; MASS-SPECTROMETRY; SERUM BIOMARKERS; STABILITY;
D O I
10.1515/sagmb-2012-0067
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In omics studies aimed at the early detection and diagnosis of cancer, bioinformatics tools play a significant role when analyzing high dimensional, complex datasets, as well as when identifying a small set of biomarkers. However, in many cases, there are ambiguities in the robustness and the consistency of the discovered biomarker sets, since the feature selection methods often lead to irreproducible results. To address this, both the stability and the classification power of several chemometrics-based feature selection algorithms were evaluated using the Monte Carlo sampling technique, aiming at finding the most suitable feature selection methods for early cancer detection and biomarker discovery. To this end, two data sets were analyzed, which comprised of MALDI-TOF-MS and LC/TOF-MS spectra measured on serum samples in order to diagnose ovarian cancer. Using these datasets, the stability and the classification power of multiple feature subsets found by different feature selection methods were quantified by varying either the number of selected features, or the number of samples in the training set, with special emphasis placed on the property of stability. The results show that high consistency does not necessarily guarantee high predictive power. In addition, differences in the stability, as well as agreement in feature lists between several feature selection methods, depend on several factors, such as the number of available samples, feature sizes, quality of the information in the dataset, etc. Among the tested methods, only the variable importance in projection (VIP)-based method shows complementary properties, providing both highly consistent and accurate subsets of features. In addition, successive projection analysis (SPA) was excellent with regards to maintaining high stability over a wide range of experimental conditions. The stability of several feature selection methods is highly variable, stressing the importance of making the proper choice among feature selection methods. Therefore, rather than evaluating the selected features using only classification accuracy, stability measurements should be examined as well to improve the reliability of biomarker discovery.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 223
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multiple Sclerosis Biomarker Discovery via Bayesian Feature Selection
    Pour, Ali Foroughi
    Dalton, Lori A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS, COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2016, : 540 - 541
  • [22] An Ensemble Feature Selection Method for Biomarker Discovery
    Shahrjooihaghighi, Aliasghar
    Frigui, Hichem
    Zhang, Xiang
    Wei, Xiaoli
    Shi, Biyun
    Trabelsi, Ameni
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SIGNAL PROCESSING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (ISSPIT), 2017, : 416 - 421
  • [23] HE4 as an Early Detection Biomarker of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Investigations in Prediagnostic Specimens From the Janus Serumbank
    Gislefoss, Randi Elin
    Langseth, Hilde
    Bolstad, Nils
    Nustad, Kjell
    Morkrid, Lars
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2015, 25 (09) : 1608 - 1615
  • [24] Biomarker-Based Early Cancer Detection: Is It Achievable?
    Hazelton, William D.
    Luebeck, E. Georg
    SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2011, 3 (109)
  • [25] Robustness May be at Odds with Stability in Adversarial Training based Feature Selection?
    Liu, Yue
    Li, Yun
    2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING (ICDM), 2022, : 1071 - 1076
  • [26] A critical assessment of the feature selection methods used for biomarker discovery in current metaproteomics studies
    Tang, Jing
    Wang, Yunxia
    Fu, Jianbo
    Zhou, Ying
    Luo, Yongchao
    Zhang, Ying
    Li, Bo
    Yang, Qingxia
    Xue, Weiwei
    Lou, Yan
    Qiu, Yunqing
    Zhu, Feng
    BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2020, 21 (04) : 1378 - 1390
  • [27] Robust biomarker discovery for hepatocellular carcinoma from high-throughput data by multiple feature selection methods
    Zhang, Zishuang
    Liu, Zhi-Ping
    BMC MEDICAL GENOMICS, 2021, 14 (SUPPL 1)
  • [28] Robust biomarker discovery for hepatocellular carcinoma from high-throughput data by multiple feature selection methods
    Zishuang Zhang
    Zhi-Ping Liu
    BMC Medical Genomics, 14
  • [29] Ensemble feature selection with data-driven thresholding for Alzheimer's disease biomarker discovery
    Spooner, Annette
    Mohammadi, Gelareh
    Sachdev, Perminder S.
    Brodaty, Henry
    Sowmya, Arcot
    BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [30] A Comparative Study of Redundant Feature Detection based Feature Selection Methods
    Zeng, Xue-Qiang
    Chen, Qian-Sheng
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER, INFORMATION AND TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (CITS), 2014,