Effects of selected parameters on the response of the evaporative light scattering detector in supercritical fluid chromatography

被引:35
作者
Lesellier, E. [1 ]
Valarche, A. [2 ]
West, C. [1 ]
Dreux, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Orleans, CNRS, UMR 7311, ICOA, F-45067 Orleans 2, France
[2] SEDERE, F-94140 Alfortville, France
关键词
ELSD; SFC; Detector response; Modifier nature; Injected volume; Flow rate; LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY; ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY; MOBILE-PHASE; TRIGLYCERIDES; ENHANCEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2012.04.065
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Due to the renewal of the use of supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC), the coupling of SFC with evaporative light scattering detection (ELSD) needs to be revisited. Indeed, SFC and ELSD apparatus have evolved, while understanding of the nebulisation process has improved. This detector, first developed for polymer analyses can be used for a lot of compounds that do not display sufficient UV absorption. Because the response of ELSD is related to numerous parameters, such as mobile phase composition, the velocity difference between the mobile phase and the nebulisation gas, or the nebulisation temperature, many additional studies are necessary to understand its behaviour in SFC as compared to HPLC. The effects of the nature of co-solvent added to carbon dioxide (methanol, ethanol and acetonitrile), the injected volume and the flow rate on the ELSD response were studied. Certain parameters induce great changes on the nebulisation recovery (the proportion of mobile phase entering the drift tube), allowing for a dramatic improvement in peak area. Moreover, effects of the particle size in the aerosol were also observed, related, as expected, to the modifier nature, but strangely also to the injected volume. Specific and positive behaviour of the ELSD detection on the apparent peak efficiency was confirmed in SFC, for large injected volumes. Finally, a flow rate increase reduces peak area, showing that the use of high flow rates, although attractive to shorten analysis duration, is not favourable to ELSD response. Numerous parameters acting on detector response are modified by the flow rate change, such as the mobile phase velocity. Moreover, measurement of the nebulisation chamber temperature shows the strong decrease of temperature for high flow rates, due to the supercritical fluid depressurisation. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 226
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Use of evaporative light scattering detection for the quality control of drug substances: Influence of different liquid chromatographic and evaporative light scattering detector parameters on the appearance of spike peaks [J].
Almeling, Stefan ;
Holzgrabe, Ulrike .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2010, 1217 (14) :2163-2170
[2]   AEROSOL TRANSPORT MODEL FOR ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY [J].
BROWNER, RF ;
BOORN, AW ;
SMITH, DD .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1982, 54 (08) :1411-1419
[3]   Corona-charged aerosol detection in supercritical fluid chromatography for pharmaceutical analysis [J].
Brunelli, C. ;
Gorecki, T. ;
Zhao, Y. ;
Sandra, P. .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2007, 79 (06) :2472-2482
[4]   EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF THE NUKIYAMA-TANASAWA EQUATION FOR PNEUMATIC NEBULIZERS USED IN PLASMA ATOMIC EMISSION-SPECTROMETRY [J].
CANALS, A ;
HERNANDIS, V ;
BROWNER, RF .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY, 1990, 5 (01) :61-66
[5]   EVAPORATIVE ANALYZER AS A MASS DETECTOR FOR LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY [J].
CHARLESWORTH, JM .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1978, 50 (11) :1414-1420
[6]   Improving the universal response of evaporative light scattering detection by mobile phase compensation [J].
de Villiers, Andre ;
Gorecki, Tadeusz ;
Lynen, Frederic ;
Szucs, Roman ;
Sandra, Pat .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2007, 1161 (1-2) :183-191
[7]   Mechanism of response enhancement in evaporative light scattering detection with the addition of triethylamine and formic acid [J].
Deschamps, FS ;
Baillet, A ;
Chaminade, P .
ANALYST, 2002, 127 (01) :35-41
[8]   SURFACE-TENSION EFFECTS ON AEROSOL PROPERTIES IN ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY [J].
FARINO, J ;
BROWNER, RF .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1984, 56 (14) :2709-2714
[9]   INFLUENCE OF VARIOUS PARAMETERS ON THE RESPONSE FACTORS OF THE EVAPORATIVE LIGHT-SCATTERING DETECTOR FOR A NUMBER OF NON-VOLATILE COMPOUNDS [J].
GUIOCHON, G ;
MOYSAN, A ;
HOLLEY, C .
JOURNAL OF LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1988, 11 (12) :2547-2570
[10]  
HERON S, 2006, LCGC, V12, P2