Distribution characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG in false-positive results detected by chemiluminescent immunoassay

被引:1
|
作者
Lei, Yan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lu, Xiaolan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mou, Daiyong [4 ]
Du, Qin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Guangrong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Qiang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] North Sichuan Med Coll, Dept Clin Lab, Affiliated Hosp, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] North Sichuan Med Coll, Dept Lab Med, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] North Sichuan Med Coll, Translat Med Res Ctr, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] Nanchong Cent Hosp, Dept Clin Lab, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
来源
OPEN LIFE SCIENCES | 2022年 / 17卷 / 01期
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; antibody; chemiluminescent immunoassay; immunoglobulin M; immunoglobulin G; false positive;
D O I
10.1515/biol-2022-0512
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
There have been several false-positive results in the antibody detection of COVID-19. This study aimed to analyze the distribution characteristics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) in false-positive results using chemiluminescent immunoassay. The characteristics of false-positive results in SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG tests were analyzed. The false-positive proportion of single SARS-CoV-2 IgM-positive results was 95.88%, which was higher than those of single SARS-CoV-2 IgG-positive results (71.05%; p < 0.001) and SARS-CoV-2 IgM- and IgG-positive results (39.39%; p < 0.001). The S/CO ratios of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG in false-positive results ranged from 1.0 to 50.0. The false-positive probability of SARS-CoV-2 IgM in the ratios of specimen signals to the cutoff value (S/CO) range (1.0-3.0) was 95.06% (77/81), and the probability of false-positive results of SARS-CoV-2 IgG in the S/CO range (1.0-2.0) was 85.71% (24/28). Dynamic monitoring showed that the S/CO values of IgM in false-positive results decreased or remained unchanged, whereas the S/CO values of IgG in false-positive results decreased. The possibility of false-positive single SARS-CoV-2 IgM-positive and single SARS-CoV-2 IgG-positive results was high. As the value of S/CO ratios decreased, the probability of false-positives consequently increased, especially among the single SARS-CoV-2 IgM-positive results.
引用
收藏
页码:1487 / 1496
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] False-Positive Results of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR in Oropharyngeal Swabs From Vaccinators
    Kong, Xiang-Qi
    Wang, Yong-Jing
    Fang, Zan-Xi
    Yang, Tian-Ci
    Tong, Man-Li
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [12] Patterns of Possible False-Positive Results for Three Commercial Real-Time PCR Kits for SARS-CoV-2
    Park, Kuenyoul
    Sung, Heungsup
    Kim, Mi-Na
    CLINICAL LABORATORY, 2022, 68 (10) : 2219 - 2223
  • [13] Potential for false-positive results with quantitative antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2: A case of a child with acute respiratory infection
    Hase, Ryota
    Kurita, Takashi
    Mito, Haruki
    Yano, Yudai
    Watari, Tomohisa
    Otsuka, Yoshihito
    Oshima, Nozomu
    Noguchi, Yasushi
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2022, 28 (02) : 319 - 320
  • [14] Streamlining SARS-CoV-2 confirmatory testing to reduce false positive results
    Wilson, Michael J.
    Sparkes, Dominic
    Myers, Chloe
    Smielewska, Anna A.
    Husain, Mir Mubariz
    Smith, Christopher
    Rolfe, Kathryn J.
    Zhang, Hongyi
    Jalal, Hamid
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 136
  • [15] Performance Characteristics of the Vidas SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG Serological Assays
    Renard, Nathalie
    Daniel, Soizic
    Cayet, Nadege
    Pecquet, Matthieu
    Raymond, Frederique
    Pons, Sylvie
    Lupo, Julien
    Tourneur, Carole
    Pretis, Catherine
    Gerez, Guillaume
    Blasco, Patrick
    Combe, Maxime
    Canova, Imen
    Lesenechal, Mylene
    Berthier, Franck
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 59 (04)
  • [16] Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibody detection with a lateral flow immunoassay test
    Diani, Erica
    Piccaluga, Pier Paolo
    Lotti, Virginia
    Di Clemente, Andrea
    Ligozzi, Marco
    De Nardo, Pasquale
    Lambertenghi, Lorenza
    Pizzolo, Francesca
    Friso, Simonetta
    Lo Cascio, Giuliana
    Vianello, Alice
    Marchi, Giacomo
    Concia, Ercole
    Gibellini, Davide
    HELIYON, 2021, 7 (10)
  • [17] Comparison of three automatic chemiluminescent immunoassays for monitoring dynamic profile of SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM
    Dou, Xiaowen
    Wang, Enyun
    Hu, Jiwen
    Zong, Zengyan
    Jiang, Ruiwei
    Wang, Mengmeng
    Kan, Lijuan
    Zhang, Xiuming
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS, 2021, 35 (01)
  • [18] Strategic Retesting to Reduce False Positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR Test Results
    Toda, Hirofumi
    Tanaka, Yuji
    Yamade, Kenji
    Yoshitomi, Kazue
    Yoshida, Koichiro
    Kamisako, Toshinori
    CLINICAL LABORATORY, 2024, 70 (05) : 993 - 999
  • [19] Generation of False-Positive SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Results with Testing Conditions outside Manufacturer Recommendations: A Scientific Approach to Pandemic Misinformation
    Patriquin, Glenn
    Davidson, Ross J.
    Hatchette, Todd F.
    Head, Breanne M.
    Mejia, Edgard
    Becker, Michael G.
    Meyers, Adrienne
    Sandstrom, Paul
    Hatchette, Jacob
    Block, Ava
    Smith, Nicole
    Ross, John
    LeBlanc, Jason J.
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2021, 9 (02):
  • [20] Continuous false positive results by SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing: a case report
    Galipeau, Yannick
    Xavier, Abishek
    Dyks, Aaron
    Cooper, Curtis
    Langlois, Marc-Andre
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11