Quality Initiatives Statistical Control Charts: Simplifying the Analysis of Data for Quality Improvement

被引:34
作者
Cheung, Yvonne Y. [1 ]
Jung, Boyoun [2 ]
Sohn, Jae Ho [2 ]
Ogrinc, Greg [3 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[2] Dartmouth Coll, Hitchcock Med Ctr, Dartmouth Med Sch, Hanover, NH 03756 USA
[3] VA Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, White River Jct, VT USA
关键词
CARE;
D O I
10.1148/rg.327125713
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Quality improvement (QI) projects are an integral part of today's radiology practice, helping identify opportunities for improving outcomes by refining work processes. QI projects are typically driven by outcome measures, but the data can be difficult to interpret: The numbers tend to fluctuate even before a process is altered, and after a QI intervention takes place, it may be even more difficult to determine the cause of such vacillations. Control chart analysis helps the QI project team identify variations that should be targeted for intervention and avoid tampering in processes in which variation is random or harmless. Statistical control charts make it possible to distinguish among random variation or noise in the data, outlying tendencies that should be targeted for future intervention, and changes that signify the success of previous intervention. The data on control charts are plotted over time and integrated with various graphic devices that represent statistical reasoning (eg, control limits) to allow visualization of the intensity and overall effect-negative or positive-of variability. Even when variability has no substantial negative effect, appropriate intervention based on the results of control chart analysis can help increase the efficiency of a process by optimizing the central tendency of the outcome measure. Different types of control charts may be used to analyze the same outcome dataset: For example, paired charts of individual values (x) and the moving range (mR) allow robust and reliable analyses of most types of data from radiology QI projects. Many spreadsheet programs and templates are available for use in creating x-mR charts and other types of control charts. Supplemental material available at http://radiographics.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/rg.327125713/-/DC1. (C) RSNA, 2012 . radiographics.rsna.org
引用
收藏
页码:2113 / 2126
页数:14
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] American Society for Testing and Materials, 1990, ASTM MAN PRES DAT CO, V7
  • [2] Amin S G, 2001, Qual Manag Health Care, V9, P1
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, UNDERSTANDING STAT P
  • [4] Blackmore C Craig, 2007, J Am Coll Radiol, V4, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.11.014
  • [5] QUALITY IMPROVEMENT TECHNIQUES - VALUE TO IMPROVE THE TIMELINESS OF PREOPERATIVE CHEST RADIOGRAPHIC REPORTS
    BLUTH, EI
    HAVRILLA, M
    BLAKEMAN, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1993, 160 (05) : 995 - 998
  • [6] Carey RG, 2003, IMPROVING HEALTHCARE, P194
  • [7] Quality Initiatives Department Scorecard: A Tool to Help Drive Imaging Care Delivery Performance
    Donnelly, Lane F.
    Gessner, Kevin E.
    Dickerson, Julie M.
    Koch, Bernadette L.
    Towbin, Alexander J.
    Lehkamp, Todd W.
    Moskovitz, Jay
    Brody, Alan S.
    Dumoulin, Charles L.
    Jones, Blaise V.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2010, 30 (07) : 2029 - 2038
  • [8] Medicare's Physician Quality Reporting Initiative: Incentives, Physician Work, and Perceived Impact on Patient Care
    Duszak, Richard, Jr.
    Saunders, Worth M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 7 (06) : 419 - 424
  • [9] Process Improvement: What Is It, Why Is It Important, and How Is It Done?
    Johnson, C. Daniel
    Miranda, Rafael
    Aakre, Kenneth T.
    Roberts, Catherine C.
    Patel, Maitray D.
    Krecke, Karl N.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (02) : 461 - 468
  • [10] Quality Initiatives Quality Improvement in Radiology: Basic Principles and Tools Required to Achieve Success
    Kruskal, Jonathan B.
    Eisenberg, Ronald
    Sosna, Jacob
    Yam, Chun Sham
    Kruskal, Joshua D.
    Boiselle, Phillip M.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2011, 31 (06) : 1499 - 1509