共 50 条
Comparison of Clopidogrel and Ticlopidine/Ginkgo Biloba in Patients With Clopidogrel Resistance and Carotid Stenting
被引:6
|作者:
Chung, Jong-Won
[1
]
Kim, Suk Jae
[1
]
Hwang, Jaechun
[2
]
Lee, Mi Ji
[1
]
Lee, Jun
[3
]
Lee, Kyung-Yul
[4
]
Park, Man-Seok
[5
]
Sung, Sang Min
[6
]
Kim, Keon Ha
[7
]
Jeon, Pyoung
[7
]
Bang, Oh Young
[1
]
机构:
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Chilgok Hosp, Dept Neurol, Sch Med, Daegu, South Korea
[3] Yeungnam Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Daegu, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Gangnam Severance Hosp, Dept Neurol, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Chonnam Natl Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Gwangju, South Korea
[6] Busan Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Neurol, Busan, South Korea
[7] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Samsung Med Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
来源:
FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY
|
2019年
/
10卷
关键词:
clopidogrel resistance;
carotid stenosis;
stroke;
ischemia;
ticlopidine;
surrogate endpoint;
TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK;
PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION;
TREATMENT PLATELET REACTIVITY;
MINOR STROKE;
GENETIC POLYMORPHISMS;
CLINICAL-OUTCOMES;
RISK-FACTORS;
ASPIRIN;
ANTIPLATELET;
EFFICACY;
D O I:
10.3389/fneur.2019.00044
中图分类号:
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background and Purpose: Patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS) who show low responsiveness to clopidogrel may have a higher risk of pen-procedural embolic events. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of clopidogrel and ticlopidine plus Ginkgo biloba in clopidogrel-resistant patients undergoing CAS. Methods: In this multi-center, randomized, controlled trial, we used platelet reactivity test to select patients undergoing CAS who showed clopidogrel resistance, and compared treatments using clopidogrel and ticlopidine plus ginkgo. The primary outcome was the incidence of new ischemic lesion in the ipsilateral hemisphere of CAS. Detection of microembolic signal on transcranial Doppler was the secondary outcome. The clinical outcomes were also monitored. Results: This trial was discontinued after 42 patients were randomized after preplanned interim sample size re-estimation indicated an impractical sample size. The primary endpoint occurred in 12/22 patients (54.5%) in the clopidogrel group and 13/20 patients (65.0%) in the ticlopidine-ginkgo group (P = 0.610). No significant differences in the presence of microembolic signal (15.0 vs. 11.8%, P = 0.580), clinical outcomes (ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, 0.0 vs. 5.5%; acute myocardial infarction 0.0 vs. 0.0%; all-cause death, 4.5 vs. 0.0%), or incidence of adverse events were found in the two groups. In terms of resistance to clopidogrel, treatment with ticlopidine-ginkgo significantly increased the P2Y12 Reaction Units (difference, 0.0 [-0.3-3.0] vs. 21.0 [6.0-35.0], P < 0.001). Conclusions: In patients who showed clopidogrel resistance, ticlopidine-ginkgo treatment was safe and increased P2Y12 Reaction Units; however, compared to clopidogrel, it failed to improve surrogate and clinical endpoints in patients undergoing CAS. This multimodal biomarker-based clinical trial is feasible in neurointerventional research.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文