The unnoticed impact of long-term cost information on wind farms' economic value in the USA. - A real option analysis

被引:22
作者
Maeda, Mansaku [1 ]
Watts, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Dept Elect Engn, Vicuna Mackenna 4860, Santiago, Chile
关键词
Levelized cost of energy; Wind energy; Managerial flexibilities; Deferring investment; Renewable energy; Real option; RENEWABLE ENERGY INVESTMENTS; POWER-GENERATION; VALUATION; PROJECTS; STORAGE; SIMULATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.065
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Renewable energies are a natural replacement for conventional or fossil fuel energy generation. One of these sources, wind energy, has exhibited significant cost reductions during the last decades. Even though this historical cost reduction trend is well known in the industry and in the academia, information on this cost trend and volatility has been scarcely incorporated in previous works, thus a natural concern arises when assessing their influence on the economic valuation of wind farms. Moreover, wind projects are modular in size and have a short time-to-market, providing a valuable managerial flexibility to defer investment under non-attractive market conditions, such as high development cost scenarios. Traditional evaluation tools often consider those scenarios, wrongly assuming that wind-developers would move forward with the project under such conditions. Accordingly, this paper analyzes the effect of incorporating both generation cost history and investment flexibility in the valuation of wind farms in the United States using Real Options methodology. Taking two decades of cost data and a reference wind farm, this "uncertainty-flexibility" effect is incorporated and valued, finding that the value of the wind project is 14.2% larger than the one neglecting such effect - where cost stochasticity and managerial flexibility are ignored. Therefore, traditional tools for project valuation, such as discounted cash flow and scenario analysis can no longer solely be used, as they do not properly account for the cost reduction trend, uncertainty, and managerial flexibility that a wind farm could face.
引用
收藏
页码:540 / 547
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [31] Pindyck RS, 2001, ENERGY J, V22, P1
  • [32] Price S, 2008, US DOE ENERGY EFFIC, P131
  • [33] Renewable energy investment: Policy and market impacts
    Reuter, Wolf Heinrich
    Szolgayova, Jana
    Fuss, Sabine
    Obersteiner, Michael
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2012, 97 : 249 - 254
  • [34] Investment in wind power and pumped storage in a real options model
    Reuter, Wolf Heinrich
    Fuss, Sabine
    Szolgayova, Jana
    Obersteiner, Michael
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (04) : 2242 - 2248
  • [35] Ritzenhofen I, 2015, ENERG ECON, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.2260934, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2260934]
  • [36] Real Options versus Traditional Methods to assess Renewable Energy Projects
    Santos, Lucia
    Soares, Isabel
    Mendes, Carla
    Ferreira, Paula
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2014, 68 : 588 - 594
  • [37] Technology S-curves in renewable energy alternatives: Analysis and implications for industry and government
    Schilling, Melissa A.
    Esmundo, Melissa
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (05) : 1767 - 1781
  • [38] Spera DA, 2009, WIND TURBINE TECHNOLOGY: FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS OF WIND TURBINE ENGINEERING, SECOND EDITION, P1, DOI 10.1115/1.802601
  • [39] The valuation of photovoltaic power generation under carbon market linkage based on real options
    Tian, Lixin
    Pan, Jianglai
    Du, Ruijin
    Li, Wenchao
    Zhen, Zaili
    Gao Qibing
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 201 : 354 - 362
  • [40] U. S. Department of Energy (DOE), 2014, WIND POW US REC PROG