The unnoticed impact of long-term cost information on wind farms' economic value in the USA. - A real option analysis

被引:22
作者
Maeda, Mansaku [1 ]
Watts, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Dept Elect Engn, Vicuna Mackenna 4860, Santiago, Chile
关键词
Levelized cost of energy; Wind energy; Managerial flexibilities; Deferring investment; Renewable energy; Real option; RENEWABLE ENERGY INVESTMENTS; POWER-GENERATION; VALUATION; PROJECTS; STORAGE; SIMULATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.065
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Renewable energies are a natural replacement for conventional or fossil fuel energy generation. One of these sources, wind energy, has exhibited significant cost reductions during the last decades. Even though this historical cost reduction trend is well known in the industry and in the academia, information on this cost trend and volatility has been scarcely incorporated in previous works, thus a natural concern arises when assessing their influence on the economic valuation of wind farms. Moreover, wind projects are modular in size and have a short time-to-market, providing a valuable managerial flexibility to defer investment under non-attractive market conditions, such as high development cost scenarios. Traditional evaluation tools often consider those scenarios, wrongly assuming that wind-developers would move forward with the project under such conditions. Accordingly, this paper analyzes the effect of incorporating both generation cost history and investment flexibility in the valuation of wind farms in the United States using Real Options methodology. Taking two decades of cost data and a reference wind farm, this "uncertainty-flexibility" effect is incorporated and valued, finding that the value of the wind project is 14.2% larger than the one neglecting such effect - where cost stochasticity and managerial flexibility are ignored. Therefore, traditional tools for project valuation, such as discounted cash flow and scenario analysis can no longer solely be used, as they do not properly account for the cost reduction trend, uncertainty, and managerial flexibility that a wind farm could face.
引用
收藏
页码:540 / 547
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2013, Levelized Cost of Electricity Renewable Energy Technologies
  • [2] Investment timing and optimal capacity choice for small hydropower projects
    Bockman, Thor
    Fleten, Stein-Erik
    Juliussen, Erik
    Langhammer, Havard J.
    Revdal, Ingemar
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2008, 190 (01) : 255 - 267
  • [3] Renewable energy investments under different support schemes: A real options approach
    Boomsma, Trine Krogh
    Meade, Nigel
    Fleten, Stein-Erik
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 220 (01) : 225 - 237
  • [4] Real options theory applied to electricity generation projects: A review
    Cesena, E. A. Martinez
    Mutale, J.
    Rivas-Davalos, F.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 19 : 573 - 581
  • [5] Clement E, 2001, ANAL LONGSTAFF SCHWA
  • [6] The valuation of multidimensional American real options using the LSM simulation method
    Cortazar, Gonzalo
    Gravet, Miguel
    Urzua, Jorge
    [J]. COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2008, 35 (01) : 113 - 129
  • [7] Optimizing the level of renewable electric R&D expenditures using real options analysis
    Davis, GA
    Owens, B
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2003, 31 (15) : 1589 - 1608
  • [8] Real options approach to renewable energy investments in Mongolia
    Detert, Neal
    Kotani, Koji
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 56 : 136 - 150
  • [9] Valuation of wind power distributed generation by using Longstaff-Schwartz option pricing method
    Diaz, Guzman
    Moreno, Blanca
    Coto, Jose
    Gomez-Aleixandre, Javier
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 145 : 223 - 233
  • [10] Dixit K., 1994, INVESTMENT UNCERTAIN