Maritime and Port Activity Analysis Tool

被引:1
作者
Safa, Mahdi [1 ]
Craig, Brian N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lamar Univ, Beaumont, TX 77705 USA
来源
ADVANCES IN HUMAN ASPECTS OF TRANSPORTATION | 2017年 / 484卷
关键词
Activity analysis; Workforce productivity; Safety; Maritime and port operation;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-41682-3_87
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Safety and productivity are crucial considerations when evaluating the effectiveness management has exhibited in their control of the operations involved with maritime transport and port management. Recent maritime and port management research has been concentrated primarily on the use of state-of-the-art technologies that result in the level of productivity becoming less dependent on the workforce. However, industry experts have consistently recognized and been concerned about challenges that remain in the enhancement of workforce productivity and safety. No readily available guide describing how to conduct activity analysis has existed until now. Hence, this research project involves the investigation and application of "activity analysis" methodologies. Activity analysis denotes the extension of simple work sampling so that it becomes a continuous productivity and safety improvement program. Such a program entails a cyclical process designed to quantify the activities of craft workers to identify barriers to safety and optimal productivity, to implement improvements for reducing or eliminating these barriers.
引用
收藏
页码:1065 / 1074
页数:10
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] Aft LawrenceS., 2000, WORK MEASUREMENT MET
  • [2] Bellamy L. J., 2015, NUTRITIONAL CARE PAT, P445
  • [3] Beresford A.K.C., 2004, Maritime Policy and Management, V31, number, P93, DOI DOI 10.1080/0308883042000205061
  • [4] CII, 2010, GUID ACT AN
  • [5] Port safety and the container revolution: A statistical study on human factor and occupational accidents over the long period
    Fabiano, Bruno
    Curro, Fabio
    Reverberi, Andrea P.
    Pastorino, Renato
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2010, 48 (08) : 980 - 990
  • [6] THOMAS HR, 1986, J CONSTR ENG M ASCE, V112, P245, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1986)112:2(245)
  • [7] Zack CM., 2004, DIRECT LABOR PRODUCT