The effect of social categorization on trust decisions in a trust game paradigm

被引:9
|
作者
Canadas, Elena [1 ]
Rodriguez-Bailon, Rosa [2 ]
Lupianez, Juan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne, Dept Org Behav, Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Univ Granada, Mind Brain & Behav Res Ctr, Dept Social Psychol, Granada, Spain
[3] Univ Granada, Dept Expt Psychol, Mind Brain & Behav Res Ctr, Granada, Spain
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2015年 / 6卷
关键词
trust game; categorization; individuation; ingroup-outgroup perception; cooperation; EXPERIMENTAL TESTS; IN-GROUP; RACE; PREJUDICE; COMPETITION; JUDGMENTS; ATTITUDES; GENDER; PREFERENCES; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01568
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study investigates whether participants use categorical or individual knowledge about others in order to make cooperative decisions in an adaptation of the trust game paradigm. Concretely, participants had to choose whether to cooperate or not with black and white unknown partners as a function of expected partners' reciprocity rates. Reciprocity rates were manipulated by associating three out of four members of an ethnic group (blacks or whites consistent members) with high (or low) reciprocity rates, while the remaining member of the ethnic group is associated with the reciprocity of the other ethnic group (inconsistent member). Results show opposite performance's patterns for white and black partners. Participants seemed to categorize white partners, by making the same cooperation decision with all the partners, that is, they cooperated equally with consistent and inconsistent white partners. However, this effect was not found for black partners, suggesting a tendency to individuate them. Results are discussed in light of the implications of these categorization-individuation processes for intergroup relations and cooperative economic behavior.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Trust game, survey trust, are they correlated? Evidence from China
    Yujie Tang
    Zhe Gong
    Current Psychology, 2024, 43 : 2253 - 2263
  • [32] Can Centralized Sanctioning Promote Trust in Social Dilemmas? A Two-Level Trust Game with Incomplete Information
    Wang, Raymond Yu
    Ng, Cho Nam
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (04):
  • [33] A Genetic Basis for Social Trust?
    Sturgis, Patrick
    Read, Sanna
    Hatemi, Peter K.
    Zhu, Gu
    Trull, Tim
    Wright, Margaret J.
    Martin, Nicholas G.
    POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2010, 32 (02) : 205 - 230
  • [34] Civility and trust in social media
    Antoci, Angelo
    Bonelli, Laura
    Paglieri, Fabio
    Reggiani, Tommaso
    Sabatini, Fabio
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2019, 160 : 83 - 99
  • [35] Who to Trust? Applying Trust to Social Commerce
    Sharma, Shwadhin
    Menard, Philip
    Mutchler, Leigh A.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2019, 59 (01) : 32 - 42
  • [36] An experimental analysis of cooperation and productivity in the trust game
    Deck, Cary
    EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 12 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [37] Income inequality in the trust game
    Smith, Alexander
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2011, 111 (01) : 54 - 56
  • [38] Trust motivation: The self-regulatory processes underlying trust decisions
    van der Werff, Lisa
    Legood, Alison
    Buckley, Finian
    Weibel, Antoinette
    de Cremer, David
    ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2019, 9 (2-3) : 99 - 123
  • [39] Functional connectivity of specific resting-state networks predicts trust and reciprocity in the trust game
    Bellucci, Gabriele
    Hahn, Tim
    Deshpande, Gopikrishna
    Krueger, Frank
    COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 19 (01) : 165 - 176
  • [40] Can We Trust Education for Fostering Trust? Quasi-experimental Evidence on the Effect of Education and Tracking on Social Trust
    Osterman, Marcus
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2021, 154 (01) : 211 - 233