The effect of social categorization on trust decisions in a trust game paradigm

被引:9
|
作者
Canadas, Elena [1 ]
Rodriguez-Bailon, Rosa [2 ]
Lupianez, Juan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne, Dept Org Behav, Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Univ Granada, Mind Brain & Behav Res Ctr, Dept Social Psychol, Granada, Spain
[3] Univ Granada, Dept Expt Psychol, Mind Brain & Behav Res Ctr, Granada, Spain
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2015年 / 6卷
关键词
trust game; categorization; individuation; ingroup-outgroup perception; cooperation; EXPERIMENTAL TESTS; IN-GROUP; RACE; PREJUDICE; COMPETITION; JUDGMENTS; ATTITUDES; GENDER; PREFERENCES; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01568
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study investigates whether participants use categorical or individual knowledge about others in order to make cooperative decisions in an adaptation of the trust game paradigm. Concretely, participants had to choose whether to cooperate or not with black and white unknown partners as a function of expected partners' reciprocity rates. Reciprocity rates were manipulated by associating three out of four members of an ethnic group (blacks or whites consistent members) with high (or low) reciprocity rates, while the remaining member of the ethnic group is associated with the reciprocity of the other ethnic group (inconsistent member). Results show opposite performance's patterns for white and black partners. Participants seemed to categorize white partners, by making the same cooperation decision with all the partners, that is, they cooperated equally with consistent and inconsistent white partners. However, this effect was not found for black partners, suggesting a tendency to individuate them. Results are discussed in light of the implications of these categorization-individuation processes for intergroup relations and cooperative economic behavior.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Variability in repeated economic games: comparing trust game decisions to other social trust measures
    Safra, L.
    Lettinga, N.
    Jacquet, P. O.
    Chevallier, C.
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 9 (09):
  • [2] Do you still trust me? An experimental study on the effect of uncertainty, complexity and anchors in a trust game
    Eskinazi, Naveh
    Malul, Miki
    Rosenboinn, Mosi
    Shavit, Tal
    MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2023, 44 (02) : 892 - 905
  • [3] The effect of third party intervention in the trust game
    Fiedler, Marina
    Haruvy, Ernan
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 67 : 65 - 74
  • [4] Ethnic discrimination unlearned: experience in the repeated Trust Game reduces trust bias
    Duncan, Caitlin
    Toelch, Ulf
    Walter, Henrik
    Dziobek, Isabel
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [5] Does the trust game measure trust?
    Bruelhart, Marius
    Usunier, Jean-Claude
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2012, 115 (01) : 20 - 23
  • [6] The Trust Game Does Not (Only) Measure Trust: The Risk-Trust Confound Revisited
    Chetty, Rinelle
    Hofmeyr, Andre
    Kincaid, Harold
    Monroe, Brian
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 90
  • [7] Social Interaction Behavior in ADHD in Adults in a Virtual Trust Game
    Lis, Stefanie
    Baer, Nina
    Franzen, Nele
    Hagenhoff, Meike
    Gerlach, Maika
    Koppe, Georgia
    Sammer, Gebhard
    Gallhofer, Bernd
    Kirsch, Peter
    JOURNAL OF ATTENTION DISORDERS, 2016, 20 (04) : 335 - 345
  • [8] Accountability as a Warrant for Trust: An Experiment on Sanctions and Justifications in a Trust Game
    Herne, Kaisa
    Lappalainen, Olli
    Setala, Maija
    Ylisalo, Juha
    THEORY AND DECISION, 2022, 93 (04) : 615 - 648
  • [9] Trust, trustworthiness and social networks: Playing a trust game when networks are formed in the lab
    Di Cagno, Daniela
    Sciubba, Emanuela
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2010, 75 (02) : 156 - 167
  • [10] Fuzzyfication of Repeatable Trust Game
    Motylska-Kuzma, Anna
    Mercik, Jacek
    INTELLIGENT INFORMATION AND DATABASE SYSTEMS (ACIIDS 2020), PT I, 2020, 12033 : 135 - 144