The effect of social categorization on trust decisions in a trust game paradigm

被引:9
作者
Canadas, Elena [1 ]
Rodriguez-Bailon, Rosa [2 ]
Lupianez, Juan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne, Dept Org Behav, Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Univ Granada, Mind Brain & Behav Res Ctr, Dept Social Psychol, Granada, Spain
[3] Univ Granada, Dept Expt Psychol, Mind Brain & Behav Res Ctr, Granada, Spain
关键词
trust game; categorization; individuation; ingroup-outgroup perception; cooperation; EXPERIMENTAL TESTS; IN-GROUP; RACE; PREJUDICE; COMPETITION; JUDGMENTS; ATTITUDES; GENDER; PREFERENCES; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01568
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study investigates whether participants use categorical or individual knowledge about others in order to make cooperative decisions in an adaptation of the trust game paradigm. Concretely, participants had to choose whether to cooperate or not with black and white unknown partners as a function of expected partners' reciprocity rates. Reciprocity rates were manipulated by associating three out of four members of an ethnic group (blacks or whites consistent members) with high (or low) reciprocity rates, while the remaining member of the ethnic group is associated with the reciprocity of the other ethnic group (inconsistent member). Results show opposite performance's patterns for white and black partners. Participants seemed to categorize white partners, by making the same cooperation decision with all the partners, that is, they cooperated equally with consistent and inconsistent white partners. However, this effect was not found for black partners, suggesting a tendency to individuate them. Results are discussed in light of the implications of these categorization-individuation processes for intergroup relations and cooperative economic behavior.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Allport G. W., 1954, NATURE PREJUDICE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Eprime user's guide
[4]   THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION [J].
AXELROD, R ;
HAMILTON, WD .
SCIENCE, 1981, 211 (4489) :1390-1396
[5]   Trust, Punishment, and Cooperation Across 18 Societies: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Balliet, Daniel ;
Van Lange, Paul A. M. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 8 (04) :363-379
[6]   The automaticity of social life [J].
Bargh, JA ;
Williams, EL .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 15 (01) :1-4
[7]   The confounded nature of angry men and happy women [J].
Becker, D. Vaughn ;
Kenrick, Douglas T. ;
Neuberg, Steven L. ;
Blackwell, K. C. ;
Smith, Dylan M. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 92 (02) :179-190
[8]   TRUST, RECIPROCITY, AND SOCIAL-HISTORY [J].
BERG, J ;
DICKHAUT, J ;
MCCABE, K .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 1995, 10 (01) :122-142
[9]   Rewarding trust: An experimental study [J].
Bolle, F .
THEORY AND DECISION, 1998, 45 (01) :83-98
[10]   SOCIAL IDENTITY, DISTINCTIVENESS, AND IN-GROUP HOMOGENEITY [J].
BREWER, MB .
SOCIAL COGNITION, 1993, 11 (01) :150-164