Treatment of silk production wastewaters by membrane processes for sericin recovery

被引:80
作者
Capar, Goksen [1 ]
Aygun, S. Seylan [1 ]
Gecit, M. Rusen [1 ]
机构
[1] Middle E Tech Univ, Dept Engn Sci, TR-06531 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Nanofiltration; Recovery; Sericin; Silk production wastewater; Ultrafiltration;
D O I
10.1016/j.memsci.2008.09.020
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Sericin protein, although a valuable resource for many industries including cosmetics, pharmaceutical and biomedical, has been discarded as a waste in silk industry, causing environmental pollution. This paper describes determination of a membrane-based process for sericin recovery from cocoon cooking wastewaters (CCW) that will enable value-added utilization of waste sericin. The iso-electric point (pI) of sericin was found as 5-6, whose MW was distributed as 180-200, 70-80, 30-40 and 10-25 kDa. Prior to membrane filtration. sericin was separated from other impurities via centrifugation (CFG) followed by microfiltration (MF) in the pre-treatment stage, which also helped minimize post membrane fouling. Ultrafiltration (UF) and nanofiltration (NF) were adopted at a pH equal to pI of sericin. UF achieved partial recovery of sericin polypeptides at 37-60%, which was attributed to increased transmission of uncharged sericin polypeptides at their pI. On the other hand, NF achieved sericin recovery as high as 94-95%, containing all MW fractions. Severe flux decline was the major problem due to protein-membrane interactions and high sericin concentrations, where concentration polarization mainly had a dominant effect. Although flux declines were as high as 58-88% in UF and 70-75% in NF, flux recovery by at least 83% was achieved by chemical cleaning using NaOH and free chlorine. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:920 / 931
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
AKDAG B, 2007, COMMUNICATION
[2]   Silk-based biomaterials [J].
Altman, GH ;
Diaz, F ;
Jakuba, C ;
Calabro, T ;
Horan, RL ;
Chen, JS ;
Lu, H ;
Richmond, J ;
Kaplan, DL .
BIOMATERIALS, 2003, 24 (03) :401-416
[3]  
APHA AWWA WEF, 1995, STAND METH EX WAT WA
[4]   Evaluation and comparison of protein ultrafiltration test results: Dead-end stirred cell compared with a cross-flow system [J].
Becht, N. O. ;
Malik, D. J. ;
Tarleton, E. S. .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 62 (01) :228-239
[5]   The modified fouling index using ultrafiltration membranes (MFI-UF): characterisation, filtration mechanisms and proposed reference membrane [J].
Boerlage, SFE ;
Kennedy, MD ;
Dickson, MR ;
El-Hodali, DEY ;
Schippers, JC .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2002, 197 (1-2) :1-21
[6]   Characterization of commercial nanofiltration membranes and comparison with self-made polyethersulfone membranes [J].
Boussu, K. ;
Van der Bruggen, B. ;
Volodin, A. ;
Van Haesendonck, C. ;
Delcour, J. A. ;
Van der Meeren, P. ;
Vandecasteele, C. .
DESALINATION, 2006, 191 (1-3) :245-253
[7]   Protein fractionation using selective adsorption on clay surface before filtration [J].
Causserand, C ;
Kara, Y ;
Aimar, P .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2001, 186 (02) :165-181
[8]   In situ monitoring techniques for concentration polarization and fouling phenomena in membrane filtration [J].
Chen, JC ;
Li, QL ;
Elimelech, M .
ADVANCES IN COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2004, 107 (2-3) :83-108
[9]   Transglutaminase mediated grafting of silk proteins onto wool fabrics leading to improved physical and mechanical properties [J].
Cortez, Joao ;
Anghieri, Anna ;
Bonner, Philip L. R. ;
Griffin, Martin ;
Freddi, Giuliano .
ENZYME AND MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 40 (07) :1698-1704
[10]  
DEMIRALP D, 2007, PROTEIN IDENTIFICATI