Life Cycle Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis for a Water Resource Recovery Facility in India

被引:4
作者
Miller-Robbie, Leslie [1 ]
Ramaswami, Anu [1 ]
Kumar, Prasanna [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Ctr Sustainable Infrastruct Syst, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[2] Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply & Sewerage Bo, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
wastewater treatment plant; water resource recovery facility; life cycle; energy; greenhouse gas; developing cities; India; upflow anaerobic sludge blanket; NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSION; SEWAGE-TREATMENT PLANT; SLUDGE; SCALE; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEMS; DENITRIFICATION; OPTIONS; CARBON;
D O I
10.2175/106143012X13560205144371
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper quantifies life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) in India versus water quality improvements achieved from infrastructure investments. A first such analysis is conducted using operating data for a WRRF, which employs upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors and oxidation. On-site operations energy use, process GHG emissions, and embodied energy in infrastructure were quantified. The analysis showed energy use and GHG emissions of 0.2 watt-hours (Wh) and 0.3 gram carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalents per liter (gCO(2)e/L) wastewater treated, and 1.3 Wh and 2.1 gCO(2)e/gBOD removed, achieving 81% biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and 99% fecal coliform removal annually. Process emissions of WRRFs contributed 44% of life cycle GHG emissions, similar in magnitude to those from electricity (46%), whereas infrastructure contributed 10%. Average WRRF-associated GHG emissions (0.9gCO(2)e/L) were lower than those expected if untreated wastewater was released to the river. Investments made by WRRFs in developing world cities improve water quality and may mitigate overall GHG emissions.
引用
收藏
页码:621 / 631
页数:11
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] N2O Emissions from Activated Sludge Processes, 2008-2009: Results of a National Monitoring Survey in the United States
    Ahn, Joon Ho
    Kim, Sungpyo
    Park, Hongkeun
    Rahm, Brian
    Pagilla, Krishna
    Chandran, Kartik
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (12) : 4505 - 4511
  • [2] [Anonymous], P 12 INT WAT TECHN C
  • [3] [Anonymous], THESIS U COLORADO DE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2006, 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, DOI DOI 10.35-10.49
  • [5] Asano T., 1998, WASTEWATER RECLAMATI, V10
  • [6] Perspectives on sustainable wastewater treatment technologies and reuse options in the urban areas of the Mediterranean region
    Bdour, Ahmed N.
    Hamdi, Moshrik R.
    Tarawneh, Zeyad
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2009, 237 (1-3) : 162 - 174
  • [7] Nitrous oxide emission from denitrification in stream and river networks
    Beaulieu, Jake J.
    Tank, Jennifer L.
    Hamilton, Stephen K.
    Wollheim, Wilfred M.
    Hall, Robert O., Jr.
    Mulholland, Patrick J.
    Peterson, Bruce J.
    Ashkenas, Linda R.
    Cooper, Lee W.
    Dahm, Clifford N.
    Dodds, Walter K.
    Grimm, Nancy B.
    Johnson, Sherri L.
    McDowell, William H.
    Poole, Geoffrey C.
    Valett, H. Maurice
    Arango, Clay P.
    Bernot, Melody J.
    Burgin, Amy J.
    Crenshaw, Chelsea L.
    Helton, Ashley M.
    Johnson, Laura T.
    O'Brien, Jonathan M.
    Potter, Jody D.
    Sheibley, Richard W.
    Sobota, Daniel J.
    Thomas, Suzanne M.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2011, 108 (01) : 214 - 219
  • [8] Beecher N., 2008, A greenhouse gas emissions analysis of biosolids management options for Merrimack
  • [9] Bonnier S., 2008, STATE PROMOTION BIOG
  • [10] Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), 2008, WAT ENV MON STAT MON