Comparing two dinoprostone agents for preinduction cervical ripening at term -: A randomized trial

被引:0
作者
Wieland, D
Friedman, F
机构
[1] Jacobi Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
[2] CUNY Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
labor; induced; dinoprostone; cervical ripening;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety; efficacy and cost of two methods of administering commercially available dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening at term. STUDY DESIGN Sixty-nine women admitted for labor induction were randomized to receive one of two commercially available agents for cervical ripening. Half the patients received a gel containing 0.5 mg of dinaprostone placed intracervically every four hours. The other half received a polymer insert containing 20 mg of dinoprostone intravaginally. After 12 hours of cervical ripening, oxytocin was given and amniotomy performed to induce labor. RESULTS: Among 69 women randomized, 35 received the gel and 34 the polymer. No significant differences were noted between the two groups in starting characteristics or indication for induction. Both groups were similar with respect to change in Bishop score, start-to-delivery interval, amount of oxytocin required, mode of delivery and success of induction. A slightly higher rate of hyperstimulation was noted in the polymer group, although this did not lead to fetal or maternal morbidity The average costs per patient for the two agents were similar. CONCLUSION: The two dinoprostone agents are similar with respect to efficacy The polymer group had slightly more complications but without adverse fetal or maternal outcomes. A larger; multicenter trial would be required to determine actual differences in the efficacy, safety and cost of these two agents.
引用
收藏
页码:724 / 728
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Comparison of two mechanical devices for cervical ripening: a prospective quasi-randomized trial [J].
Mei-Dan, Elad ;
Walfisch, Asnat ;
Suarez-Easton, Sivan ;
Hallak, Mordechai .
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2012, 25 (06) :723-727
[42]   Pre-induction cervical ripening in post-term pregnancies with a vaginal controlled-release dinoprostone pessary [J].
Lo Dico, G. ;
Fasullo, P. ;
Bagarella, D. ;
Barreca, P. V. ;
Lucido, A. M. ;
Pollina, A. .
GIORNALE ITALIANO DI OSTETRICIA E GINECOLOGIA, 2006, 28 (10-11) :487-490
[43]   Vaginal dinoprostone and misoprostol are equally safe in labour induction at term whereas dinoprostone is less efficacious for cervical ripening and shortening the time of labour [J].
Zietek, Maciej ;
Swiatkowska-Freud, Malgorzata ;
Grajnert, Kinga ;
Celewicz, Zbigniew ;
Szczuko, Malgorzata .
GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2021, 92 (06) :428-435
[44]   Cervical Ripening Efficacy of Synthetic Osmotic Cervical Dilator Compared With Oral Misoprostol at Term A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Gavara, Rachana ;
Saad, Antonio F. ;
Wapner, RonaldJ ;
Saade, George ;
Fu, Anne ;
Barrow, Ruth ;
Nalgonda, Swapna ;
Bousleiman, Sabine ;
Almonte, Cassandra ;
Alnafisee, Sarah ;
Holman, Anita ;
Burgansky, Anna ;
Heikkila, Pekka .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 139 (06) :1083-1091
[45]   Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Shaheen, Nighat ;
Khalil, Safia .
RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 39 (03) :307-310
[46]   The risk of placental abruption when using prostaglandins for cervical ripening in women with preeclampsia: Comparing misoprostol versus dinoprostone [J].
de Tejada, Begona Martinez ;
Martillotti, Gabriella ;
Lapaire, Olav ;
Hoesli, Irene ;
Irion, Olivier .
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2010, 23 (09) :988-993
[47]   Cervical ripening: A randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and an intracervical balloon catheter combined with intravaginal dinoprostone [J].
Perry, KG ;
Larmon, JE ;
May, WL ;
Robinette, LG ;
Martin, RW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 178 (06) :1333-1337
[48]   A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Vaginal Misoprostol versus Cervical Foley Plus Oral Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction [J].
Hill, James B. ;
Thigpen, Brad D. ;
Bofill, James A. ;
Magann, Everett ;
Moore, Lisa E. ;
Martin, James N., Jr. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2009, 26 (01) :33-38
[49]   Prospective comparison of cervical ripening with double balloon Cook catheter, misoprostol or dinoprostone in term singleton pregnancies [J].
Hostinska, Eliska ;
Lubusky, Marek ;
Pilka, Radovan .
GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2023, 94 (03) :221-228
[50]   Cervical Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial [J].
de Oliveira e Oliveira, Maria Virginia ;
von Oberst, Priscilla ;
Correa Leite, Guilherme Karam ;
Aguemi, Adalberto ;
Kenj, Grecy ;
de Toledo Leme, Vera Denise ;
Sass, Nelson .
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2010, 32 (07) :346-351