SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND MAJOR INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS: THE BENEFICIAL ROLE OF RISK-ORIENTED STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

被引:25
作者
Vaidogas, Egidijus Rytas [1 ]
Juocevicius, Virmantas [1 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Dept Occupat Safety & Fire Protect, Sauletekio Al 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
sustainable development; industrial accident; risk; mechanical damage; consequences; fire; explosion; collision;
D O I
10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.612-627
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Sustainable development can be restricted by major accidents which occur in hazardous industries. Almost every major accident may have negative influence on each of the three constituents of the sustainable development: social, environmental and economic part. A characteristic feature of the most of major accidents is severe damage to the structural systems built inside and outside of the industrial facility in which the accident happens. To avoid such accidents or at least to reduce their consequences, structural systems should be designed Using a risk-based approach. On the level of detailed structural design, a formal measure of risk should be introduced and applied to express the effectiveness of the structural solution in terms of accident mitigation and minimization of potential consequences. The structural design should involve the consideration of possible accident scenarios and positive or negative contribution of; structures and structural failures to the escalation or de-escalation of the accident. This can be done by applying the risk-oriented structural design. A well-established methodological framework for such a design is provided by the quantitative risk assessment. A consequent application of a risk-based approach can be one of the risk management tools which will reduce the number of major accidents and thus their negative influence Oil sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页码:612 / 627
页数:16
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, J CIV ENG MANAG
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, RISK ANAL ENG EC
[3]   Bayesian frameworks for integrating QRA and SRA methods [J].
Aven, T ;
Rettedal, W .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 1998, 20 (02) :155-165
[4]   Accidents, causes of accidents and learning from Seveso II implementation [J].
Babinec, F ;
Ivánek, L ;
Ficbauer, V .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2005, 83 (B5) :437-442
[5]   On the assessment of robustness [J].
Baker, Jack W. ;
Schubert, Matthias ;
Faber, Michael H. .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2008, 30 (03) :253-267
[6]  
*CCPS, 2005, BUILD PROC SAF CULT
[7]   Development of accident dose consequences simulation software for nuclear emergency response applications [J].
Cheng, Yi-Hsiang ;
Shih, Chunkuan ;
Jiang, Sow-Chyuang ;
Weng, Tong-Li .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2008, 35 (05) :917-926
[8]   Building design for abnormal loads and progressive collapse [J].
Ellingwood, BR ;
Dusenberry, DO .
COMPUTER-AIDED CIVIL AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2005, 20 (03) :194-205
[9]  
Eurostat, 2004, WORK HLTH EU STAT PO
[10]   SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS BY ELIMINATING HAZARDOUS COMBINATIONS [J].
Hadad, Yossi ;
Laslo, Zohar ;
Ben-Yair, Avner .
TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2007, 13 (02) :114-119