Family Ties? The Limits of Fathering Daughters on Congressional Behavior

被引:10
作者
Costa, Mia [1 ]
Greenlee, Jill S. [2 ]
Nteta, Tatishe [3 ]
Rhodes, Jesse H. [4 ]
Sharrow, Elizabeth A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Coll, Govt, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[2] Brandeis Univ, Polit & Womens Gender & Sexual Studies, Waltham, MA USA
[3] Univ Massachusetts, Polit Sci, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[4] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Polit Sci, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[5] Univ Massachusetts, Polit Sci & Hist, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
关键词
Congress; cosponsorship; parenthood; gender; legislative behavior; FEMALE SOCIALIZATION; AMERICAN POLITICS; WOMENS INTERESTS; COSPONSORSHIP; GENDER; POLARIZATION; HOUSE; RACE; REPRESENTATION; SPEAKING;
D O I
10.1177/1532673X19826273
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Scholars have long suggested that familial life can affect political behavior and, more recently, have found that fathering daughters leads men to adopt more liberal positions on gender equality policies. However, few have focused on the impact of fathering a daughter on congressional behavior, particularly in an era of heightened partisan polarization. Using an original data set of familial information, we examine whether fathering a daughter influences male legislators' (a) roll call and cosponsorship support for women's issues in the 110th to 114th Congresses and (b) cosponsorship of bills introduced by female legislators in the 110th Congress. We find that once party affiliation is taken into account, having a daughter neither predicts support for women's issues nor cosponsorship of bills sponsored by women. Our findings suggest there are limits to the direct effects of parenting daughters on men's political behavior, and that scholars should remain attentive to institutional and partisan contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 493
页数:23
相关论文
共 77 条
[61]   THE FIRST-DAUGHTER EFFECT THE IMPACT OF FATHERING DAUGHTERS ON MEN'S PREFERENCES FOR GENDER-EQUALITY POLICIES [J].
Sharrow, Elizabeth A. ;
Rhodes, Jesse H. ;
Nteta, Tatishe M. ;
Greenlee, Jill S. .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2018, 82 (03) :493-523
[62]   Speaking out: An analysis of Democratic and Republican woman-invoked rhetoric of the 105th Congress [J].
Shogan, CJ .
WOMEN & POLITICS, 2001, 23 (1-2) :129-146
[63]  
Skvoretz J., 2002, Journal of Social Structure, V3, P139
[64]  
Swers Michele., 2002, The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress
[65]   Pursuing Women's Interests in Partisan Times: Explaining Gender Differences in Legislative Activity on Health, Education, and Women's Health Issues [J].
Swers, Michele L. .
JOURNAL OF WOMEN POLITICS & POLICY, 2016, 37 (03) :249-273
[66]  
Swers Michelle., 2013, WOMEN CLUB GENDER PO
[67]   Connecting descriptive and substantive representation: An analysis of sex differences in cosponsorship activity [J].
Swers, ML .
LEGISLATIVE STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2005, 30 (03) :407-433
[68]  
Theriault S., 2011, OXFORD HDB AM C, P576
[69]  
Theriault SM, 2008, PARTY POLARIZATION IN CONGRESS, P1
[70]  
Walsh K.C., 2002, Women transforming Congress, P370