Low gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: reclassification of severity by fusion of Doppler and computed tomographic data

被引:88
作者
Kamperidis, Vasileios [1 ,2 ]
van Rosendael, Philippe J. [1 ]
Katsanos, Spyridon [1 ]
van der Kley, Frank [1 ]
Regeer, Madelien [1 ]
Al Amri, Ibtihal [1 ]
Sianos, Georgios [2 ]
Marsan, Nina Ajmone [1 ]
Delgado, Victoria [1 ]
Bax, Jeroen J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
[2] AHEPA Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Thessaloniki, Greece
关键词
Severe aortic stenosis; Low flow-low gradient; Normal flow-low gradient; Echocardiography; Multidetector computed tomography; PARADOXICAL LOW-FLOW; VENTRICULAR OUTFLOW TRACT; VALVE AREA; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC-ASSESSMENT; RECOMMENDATIONS; QUANTIFICATION; DIAGNOSIS; INSIGHTS; IMPACT; CT;
D O I
10.1093/eurheartj/ehv188
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Low gradient severe aortic stenosis (AS) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) may be attributed to aortic valve area index (AVAi) underestimation due to the assumption of a circular shape of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) with 2-dimensional echocardiography. The current study evaluated whether fusingDoppler andmultidetector computed tomography (MDCT) data to calculate AVAi results in significant reclassification of inconsistently graded severe AS. Methods and results In total, 191 patients with AVAi, 0.6 cm(2)/m(2) and LVEF >= 50% (mean age 80 +/- 7 years, 48% male) were included in the current analysis. Patients were classified according to flow (stroke volume index <35 or >= 35 mL/m(2)) and gradient (mean transaortic pressure gradient <= 40 or >40 mmHg) into four groups: normal flow-high gradient (n = 72), low flow-high gradient (n = 31), normal flow-low gradient (n = 46), and low flow-low gradient (n = 42). Left ventricular outflow tract area was measured by planimetry on MDCT and combined with Doppler haemodynamics on continuity equation to obtain the fusion AVAi. The group of patients with normal flow-low gradient had significantly larger AVAi and LVOT area index compared with the other groups. Although MDCT-derived LVOT area index was comparable among the four groups, the fusion AVAi was significantly larger in the normal flow-low gradient group. By using the fusion AVAi, 52% (n = 24) of patients with normal flow-low gradient and 12% (n = 5) of patients with low flow-low gradient would have been reclassified into moderate AS due to AVAi >= 0.6 cm(2)/m(2). Conclusion The fusion AVAi reclassifies 52% of normal flow-low gradient and 12% of low flow-low gradient severe AS into true moderate AS, by providing true cross-sectional LVOT area.
引用
收藏
页码:2087 / 2096
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessment of left ventricular contractility in patients with severe aortic stenosis, low-flow, low-gradient and preserved ejection fraction
    Migliore, Ricardo A.
    Adaniya, Maria E.
    Barranco, Miguel
    Gonzalez, Silvia
    Miramont, Guillermo
    ARCHIVOS DE CARDIOLOGIA DE MEXICO, 2022, 92 (01): : 26 - 35
  • [42] Symptomatic Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Now Less of a Clinical Conundrum
    Wiegers, Susan E.
    CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (06) : 576 - 578
  • [43] Prognostic Value of Low Flow in Patients With High Transvalvular Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction A Multicenter Study
    Marechaux, Sylvestre
    Rusinaru, Dan
    Altes, Alexandre
    Pasquet, Agnes
    Vanoverschelde, Jean Louis
    Tribouilloy, Christophe
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2019, 12 (10)
  • [44] Concomitant mitral regurgitation and aortic stenosis: one step further to low-flow preserved ejection fraction aortic stenosis
    Benfari, Giovanni
    Clavel, Marie-Annick
    Nistri, Stefano
    Maffeis, Caterina
    Vassanelli, Corrado
    Enriquez-Sarano, Maurice
    Rossi, Andrea
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2018, 19 (05) : 569 - 573
  • [45] Preserved ejection fraction can accompany low gradient severe aortic stenosis: impact of pathophysiology on diagnostic imaging
    Bartel, Thomas
    Mueller, Silvana
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (25) : 1862 - 1863
  • [46] Clinical Challenges in Accurate Assessment of Severe Aortic Stenosis With a Special Focus on Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis and Normal Ejection Fraction
    Barboza, Joaquim
    Krishnan, Naveen
    Ananthasubramaniam, Karthikeyan
    CARDIOLOGY IN REVIEW, 2011, 19 (05) : 239 - 245
  • [47] Clinical outcomes of patients with low-flow, low-gradient, severe aortic stenosis and either preserved or reduced ejection fraction undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation
    O'Sullivan, Crochan J.
    Stortecky, Stefan
    Heg, Dik
    Pilgrim, Thomas
    Hosek, Nicola
    Buellesfeld, Lutz
    Khattab, Ahmed A.
    Nietlispach, Fabian
    Moschovitis, Aris
    Zanchin, Thomas
    Meier, Bernhard
    Windecker, Stephan
    Wenaweser, Peter
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (44) : 3437 - U32
  • [48] Prognostic value of aortic valve calcification in non-severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction
    Ye, Zi
    Scott, Christopher G.
    Gajjar, Rohan A.
    Foley, Thomas
    Clavel, Marie-Annick
    Nkomo, Vuyisile T.
    Luis, S. Allen
    Miranda, William R.
    Padang, Ratnasari
    Pislaru, Sorin, V
    Enriquez-Sarano, Maurice
    Michelena, Hector, I
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2024, 25 (10) : 1432 - 1440
  • [49] Natural History of Moderate Aortic Stenosis with Preserved and Low Ejection Fraction
    Mann, Tomer D.
    Loewenstein, Itamar
    Ben Assa, Eyal
    Topilsky, Yan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2021, 34 (07) : 735 - 743
  • [50] Stroke Volume Adjusted to Afterload for Assessment of Cardiac Performance in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
    Meledin, Valery
    Gandelman, Gera
    Derazne, Estela
    Kogan, Yoni
    George, Jacob
    Shimoni, Sara
    CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 130 (04) : 260 - 266