Low gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: reclassification of severity by fusion of Doppler and computed tomographic data

被引:88
作者
Kamperidis, Vasileios [1 ,2 ]
van Rosendael, Philippe J. [1 ]
Katsanos, Spyridon [1 ]
van der Kley, Frank [1 ]
Regeer, Madelien [1 ]
Al Amri, Ibtihal [1 ]
Sianos, Georgios [2 ]
Marsan, Nina Ajmone [1 ]
Delgado, Victoria [1 ]
Bax, Jeroen J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
[2] AHEPA Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Thessaloniki, Greece
关键词
Severe aortic stenosis; Low flow-low gradient; Normal flow-low gradient; Echocardiography; Multidetector computed tomography; PARADOXICAL LOW-FLOW; VENTRICULAR OUTFLOW TRACT; VALVE AREA; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC-ASSESSMENT; RECOMMENDATIONS; QUANTIFICATION; DIAGNOSIS; INSIGHTS; IMPACT; CT;
D O I
10.1093/eurheartj/ehv188
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Low gradient severe aortic stenosis (AS) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) may be attributed to aortic valve area index (AVAi) underestimation due to the assumption of a circular shape of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) with 2-dimensional echocardiography. The current study evaluated whether fusingDoppler andmultidetector computed tomography (MDCT) data to calculate AVAi results in significant reclassification of inconsistently graded severe AS. Methods and results In total, 191 patients with AVAi, 0.6 cm(2)/m(2) and LVEF >= 50% (mean age 80 +/- 7 years, 48% male) were included in the current analysis. Patients were classified according to flow (stroke volume index <35 or >= 35 mL/m(2)) and gradient (mean transaortic pressure gradient <= 40 or >40 mmHg) into four groups: normal flow-high gradient (n = 72), low flow-high gradient (n = 31), normal flow-low gradient (n = 46), and low flow-low gradient (n = 42). Left ventricular outflow tract area was measured by planimetry on MDCT and combined with Doppler haemodynamics on continuity equation to obtain the fusion AVAi. The group of patients with normal flow-low gradient had significantly larger AVAi and LVOT area index compared with the other groups. Although MDCT-derived LVOT area index was comparable among the four groups, the fusion AVAi was significantly larger in the normal flow-low gradient group. By using the fusion AVAi, 52% (n = 24) of patients with normal flow-low gradient and 12% (n = 5) of patients with low flow-low gradient would have been reclassified into moderate AS due to AVAi >= 0.6 cm(2)/m(2). Conclusion The fusion AVAi reclassifies 52% of normal flow-low gradient and 12% of low flow-low gradient severe AS into true moderate AS, by providing true cross-sectional LVOT area.
引用
收藏
页码:2087 / 2096
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Transesophageal echocardiography in corroborating aortic stenosis severity in patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction
    Stoklosa, Patrycjusz
    Stec-Gola, Anna
    Zakrzewski, Dariusz
    Jasinska, Anna
    Nieznanska, Malgorzata
    Kowalik, Ilona
    Michalowska, Ilona
    Hryniewiecki, Tomasz
    POLISH HEART JOURNAL-KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2025, 83 (03): : 325 - 328
  • [12] Flow-Gradient Patterns in Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Ejection Fraction Clinical Characteristics and Predictors of Survival
    Eleid, Mackram F.
    Sorajja, Paul
    Michelena, Hector I.
    Malouf, Joseph F.
    Scott, Christopher G.
    Pellikka, Patricia A.
    CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (16) : 1781 - 1789
  • [13] Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis With Low-gradient and Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Misclassification Issue?
    Gonzalez-Canovas, Cristina
    Munoz-Esparza, Carmen
    Oliva, Maria J.
    Gonzalez-Carrillo, Josefa
    Lopez-Cuenca, Angel
    Saura, Daniel
    Garcia-Navarro, Miguel
    Espinosa, Maria D.
    Caro, Cesar
    Caballero, Luis
    Valdes, Mariano
    de la Morena, Gonzalo
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2013, 66 (04): : 255 - 260
  • [14] Reclassification of aortic stenosis by fusion of echocardiography and computed tomography in low-gradient aortic stenosis
    El Faquir, N.
    Vollema, M. E.
    Delgado, V.
    Ren, B.
    Spitzer, E.
    Rasheed, M.
    Rahhab, Z.
    Geleijnse, M. L.
    Budde, R. P. J.
    de Jaegere, P. P.
    Bax, J. J.
    Van Mieghem, N. M.
    NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 30 (04) : 212 - 226
  • [15] Prognostic Impact of the Ratio of Acceleration Time to Ejection Time in Patients With Low Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Altes, Alexandre
    Thellier, Nicolas
    Bohbot, Yohann
    Marsou, Wassima
    Chadha, Gagandeep
    Binda, Camille
    Ringle, Anne
    Mailliet, Amandine
    Marotte, Nathalie
    Riolet, Clemence
    Tribouilloy, Christophe
    Marechaux, Sylvestre
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 124 (10) : 1594 - 1600
  • [16] Systemic Hypertension in Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Eleid, Mackram F.
    Nishimura, Rick A.
    Sorajja, Paul
    Borlaug, Barry A.
    CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (12) : 1349 - 1353
  • [17] Myocardial Contraction Fraction for Risk Stratification in Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Rusinaru, Dan
    Bohbot, Yohann
    Kubala, Maciej
    Diouf, Momar
    Altes, Alexandre
    Pasquet, Agnes
    Marechaux, Sylvestre
    Vanoverschelde, Jean-Louis
    Tribouilloy, Christophe
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2021, 14 (08) : E012257
  • [18] Low Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Don't Forget the Flow!
    Dumesnil, Jean G.
    Pibarot, Philippe
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2013, 66 (04): : 245 - 247
  • [19] Impact of Aortic Valve Replacement on Outcome of Symptomatic Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis With Low Gradient and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
    Ozkan, Alper
    Hachamovitch, Rory
    Kapadia, Samir R.
    Tuzcu, E. Murat
    Marwick, Thomas H.
    CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (06) : 622 - 631
  • [20] Low-gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Ejection Fraction. A Pathophysiologic Entity or a Methodologic Disparity?
    Galian, Laura
    Evangelista, Arturo
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2015, 68 (08): : 649 - 652