Vaginal Birth versus Cesarean Section on Demand - Which Mode of Delivery is Preferred by Pregnant Women?

被引:4
|
作者
Hainer, F. [1 ]
Kowalcek, I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Frauengesundheitszentrum, Interdisziplinares Forschungsinst Frauengesundhei, D-23556 Lubeck, Germany
来源
关键词
mode of delivery; Cesarean section on demand; vaginal delivery; autonomy; MIDWIFE; OBSTETRICIANS; OUTCOMES; CHOICE; VIEWS;
D O I
10.1055/s-0031-1271743
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: The Cesarean section rate continues to increase across the developed nations since there are still a number possible reasons for this development including medical and non-clinical indications. The aim of this study was to analyse how pregnant women themselves think about Cesarean section and vaginal delivery, and which mode of delivery they prefer. Methods: Pregnant women booked for prenatal diagnosis at the University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lubeck between October 2004 and January 2005 were invited to participate in the study. 534 pregnant women completed a questionnaire on their method of choice for delivery and selected background variables. Result: Women favour a natural birth and place high importance on the criteria physiology, active birth experience and personal assistance. Characteristics of the Cesarean section that were viewed negatively include surgery and pain. Conclusion: The rise in Cesarean section rates cannot be explained by the patients' preferences. In terms of patient autonomy, obstetricians should respect a woman's wish for vaginal delivery, avoiding medical intervention if clinically possible.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 40
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cesarean section and vaginal delivery in women with previous cesarean section: comparing maternal and neonatal outcomes
    Natalia Saenz, Claudia
    Rosalia Santana, Sara
    Torres, Luis
    REVISTA PERUANA DE GINECOLOGIA Y OBSTETRICIA, 2010, 56 (03): : 232 - 237
  • [22] The effect of tow modes of educational intervention on attitude toward cesarean section and vaginal delivery in pregnant women
    Shojaezadeh, Davoud
    Hashemian, Masumeh
    Asadi, Zahra Sadat
    MoghaddamHosseini, Vahideh
    Javan, Roghaye
    LIFE SCIENCE JOURNAL-ACTA ZHENGZHOU UNIVERSITY OVERSEAS EDITION, 2012, 9 (04): : 2181 - 2186
  • [23] The psychosocial impact of vaginal delivery and cesarean section in primiparous women
    Ples, Liana
    Sima, Romina M.
    Carp, Delia
    Alexandroaia, Camelia
    Balalau, Denisa O.
    Stanescu, Anca D.
    Olaru, Octavian G.
    JOURNAL OF MIND AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 5 (01): : 70 - 74
  • [24] Vaginal Birth of Twins or by Cesarean Section?
    Kerbl, R.
    MONATSSCHRIFT KINDERHEILKUNDE, 2014, 162 (03) : 197 - 198
  • [25] FIBRINOLYSIS DURING AND AFTER DELIVERY - CESAREAN-SECTION VERSUS VAGINAL DELIVERY
    STEGNAR, M
    JAPELJ, A
    MEGLIC, L
    NOVAKANTOLIC, Z
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 1993, 69 (06) : 717 - 717
  • [26] Vaginal birth after cesarean section
    Escamilla, JO
    Escamilla, GH
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 177 (06) : 1562 - 1563
  • [27] Is vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat cesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery?
    Cahill, Alison G.
    Stamilio, David M.
    Odibo, Anthony O.
    Peipert, Jeffrey F.
    Ratcliffe, Sarah J.
    Stevens, Erika J.
    Sammel, Mary D.
    Macones, George A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 195 (04) : 1143 - 1147
  • [28] Outcome of Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Spontaneous Versus Induced Labor in Women with One Previous Cesarean Section
    Kiwan, Rana
    Al Qahtani, Nourah
    ANNALS OF AFRICAN MEDICINE, 2018, 17 (03) : 145 - 150
  • [29] Vaginal birth after cesarean or recurrent elective cesarean section: What are the decision making processes of pregnant women in Turkey? A phenomenological study
    Canbay, Funda Citil
    Citil, Elif Tugce
    HEALTH CARE FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 44 (10-11) : 1500 - 1520
  • [30] Re: Is Caesarean section equal to vaginal birth as a mode of delivery?
    Inoue, T
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 45 (04): : 338 - 339