Pretreatment quality of life, performance status and their relation to treatment discontinuation and treatment changes in high-risk breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: results from the prospective randomized ADEBAR trial

被引:9
作者
Eichler, Martin [1 ]
Singer, Susanne [1 ]
Janni, Wolfgang [2 ]
Harbeck, Nadia [3 ]
Rack, Brigitte [3 ]
Augustin, Doris [4 ]
Wischnik, Arthur [5 ]
Kiechle, Marion [6 ]
Ettl, Johannes [6 ]
Scholz, Christoph [2 ]
Fink, Visnja [2 ]
Schwentner, Lukas [2 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Univ Med Ctr, IMBEI, Mainz, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Ulm, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Ulm, Germany
[3] Ludwig Maximilian Univ Munich, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Breast Ctr, Munich, Germany
[4] Clin Deggendorf Mammactr Ostbayern, Deggendorf, Germany
[5] Clin Augsburg, Breast Ctr, Augsburg, Germany
[6] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Munich, Germany
关键词
Quality of life; Performance status; Treatment discontinuation; Breast cancer; Chemotherapy; SURVIVAL; INSTRUMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s12282-016-0706-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Health-related quality of life (QoL) is a self-assessed construct indicating how people feel in regard to aspects of their health. Performance status (PS) is evaluated by the treating physician. We examined whether pretreatment QoL and PS are related to subsequent treatment discontinuation and treatment changes in high-risk breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. We conducted a prospective cohort study with data from a randomized phase III trial comparing FEC- and EC-DOC-chemotherapy in patients with primary breast cancer (ADEBAR). We examined the patient's request to discontinue the study, discontinuation due to toxicity, the prolongation of therapy, and dose reduction. Baseline QoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30. PS was evaluated using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Scale (ECOG). Four QoL scales were selected prior to analysis as outcomes: global health, physical functioning, emotional functioning, and fatigue. Multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were used to test for differences within the independent variables. 1322 patients were included. 1094 (82.8 %) patients completed therapy according to protocol. 6.3 % stopped therapy due to toxicity and 4.4 % refused treatment. Global health was not related to any of the four QoL outcomes. Physical functioning had the strongest impact on QoL, when comparing the fittest group to the lowest quintile [OR 2.14 (95 % CI 1.00-4.60)]. ECOG 0 compared to worse than 1 was strongly correlated to therapy discontinuation due to toxicity [OR 20.15 (95 % CI 9.48-42.83)] and treatment refusal [OR 8.32 (95 % CI 3.81-18.14)]. Pretreatment QoL, especially physical functioning, is associated with subsequent therapy discontinuation due to toxicity and with changes of the treatment protocol. Pretreatment performance status is strongly associated with therapy discontinuation due to toxicity and with treatment refusal.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 325
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]   Karnofsky and ECOG performance status scoring in lung cancer: A prospective, longitudinal study of 536 patients from a single institution [J].
Buccheri, G ;
Ferrigno, D ;
Tamburini, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 32A (07) :1135-1141
[3]   Quality-of-life scores predict outcome in metastatic but not early breast cancer [J].
Coates, AS ;
Hürny, C ;
Peterson, HF ;
Bernhard, J ;
Castiglione-Gertsch, M ;
Gelber, RD ;
Goldhirsch, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (22) :3768-3774
[4]  
Fayers P., 1995, EORTC QLQ C30 SCORIN
[5]  
IBM Corp, 2020, IBM SPSS statistics for Windows
[6]  
Janni W, 2012, J CLIN ONCOL S, V30
[7]   Identification and interpretation of clinical and quality of life prognostic factors for survival and response to treatment in first-line chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer [J].
Kramer, JA ;
Curran, D ;
Piccart, M ;
de Haes, JCJM ;
Bruning, P ;
Klijn, J ;
Van Hoorebeeck, I ;
Paridaens, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 36 (12) :1498-1506
[8]   Self-reported health-related quality of life is an independent predictor of chemotherapy treatment benefit and toxicity in women with advanced breast cancer [J].
Lee, C. K. ;
Stockler, M. R. ;
Coates, A. S. ;
Gebski, V. ;
Lord, S. J. ;
Simes, R. J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 102 (09) :1341-1347
[9]   QUALITY OF LIFE IN STAGE-II BREAST-CANCER - AN INSTRUMENT FOR CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
LEVINE, MN ;
GUYATT, GH ;
GENT, M ;
DEPAUW, S ;
GOODYEAR, MD ;
HRYNIUK, WM ;
ARNOLD, A ;
FINDLAY, B ;
SKILLINGS, JR ;
BRAMWELL, VH ;
LEVIN, L ;
BUSH, H ;
ABUZAHRA, H ;
KOTALIK, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1988, 6 (12) :1798-1810
[10]   Quality of life data as prognostic indicators of survival in cancer patients: an overview of the literature from 1982 to 2008 [J].
Montazeri, Ali .
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2009, 7