Development of key policy recommendations for active transport in New Zealand: A multi-sector and multidisciplinary endeavour

被引:10
作者
Mandic, Sandra [1 ]
Jackson, Andrew [2 ,8 ]
Lieswyn, John [3 ]
Mindell, Jennifer S. [4 ]
Bengoechea, Enrique Garcia [5 ]
Spence, John C. [6 ]
Coppell, Kirsten [1 ]
Wade-Brown, Celia [7 ]
Wooliscroft, Ben [1 ]
Hinckson, Erica [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
[2] Consulting Jackson Ltd, Wellington, New Zealand
[3] ViaStrada, Christchurch, New Zealand
[4] UCL, London, England
[5] Univ Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
[6] Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[7] Living St Aotearoa, Wellington, New Zealand
[8] Auckland Univ Technol, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
Policy; Active transport; Recommendations; Decision-making; Walking; Cycling; DISEASE; CARBON;
D O I
10.1016/j.jth.2020.100859
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Despite national-level initiatives to encourage active transport (AT) in New Zealand since 2005, rates of AT have continued to decline in most parts of the country, with negative impacts on health and the environment. This article describes the development of key policy recommendations for increasing AT in New Zealand. The goal was to establish a cohesive set of priority recommendations to inform AT decision-making in central and local government, district health boards, public health units and regional sports trusts in New Zealand. Project description: The development of policy recommendations was a planned outcome of multi-sectoral discussions held at The Active Living and Environment Symposium (TALES; Dunedin, New Zealand; February 2019). A ten-member working group consisting of TALES symposium delegates working in academia, industry and non-governmental organisations led the development of the recommendations. Symposium delegates contributed their expertise to draft recommendations and reports prior to, during and after the symposium. Importance and feasibility of each recommended action were independently evaluated by working group members. The final set of 13 policy recommendations (and 39 associated actions) included: making a national-level commitment to change; establishing a nationally coordinated and funded programme of education and promotion of AT; making a commitment to design cities for people, not cars; and developing a regulatory system that encourages AT. The report aligns with the current New Zealand government's increased focus on wellbeing, walking, cycling, public transport and the Vision Zero approach. A final report was officially launched in April 2019 with presentations to stakeholders April-May 2019. Conclusions: This cross-sector effort resulted in a report with a set of recommendations designed to stimulate the development of a new AT strategy for New Zealand; prompt setting of targets and monitoring progress/outcomes; and inform New Zealand's response to the World Health Organization's Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018-2030.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Guidelines-Developing and Implementing a Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, SAF JOURN PEOPL WHO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, TURNING TIDE CARS AC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, CYCL WALK INV STRAT
[5]  
Auckland Transport, 2019, BETT TRAV CHOIC CREA
[6]  
Brisbane City Council, 2012, BRISB ACT TRANSP STR
[7]  
City of Vancouver, WALK BIK ROLL GETT A
[8]   Translating evidence to policy: urban interventions and physical activity promotion in Bogota, Colombia and Curitiba, Brazil [J].
Diaz del Castillo, Adriana ;
Sarmiento, Olga L. ;
Reis, Rodrigo S. ;
Brownson, Ross C. .
TRANSLATIONAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2011, 1 (02) :350-360
[9]   CONSENSUS METHODS - CHARACTERISTICS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE [J].
FINK, A ;
KOSECOFF, J ;
CHASSIN, M ;
BROOK, RH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1984, 74 (09) :979-983
[10]   Translating active living research into policy and practice: One important pathway to chronic disease prevention [J].
Giles-Corti, Billie ;
Sallis, James F. ;
Sugiyama, Takemi ;
Frank, Lawrence D. ;
Lowe, Melanie ;
Owen, Neville .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY, 2015, 36 (02) :231-243