Screening, Treatment, and Prostate Cancer Mortality in the Seattle Area and Connecticut: Fifteen-year Follow-up

被引:31
作者
Lu-Yao, Grace [2 ]
Albertsen, Peter C. [3 ]
Stanford, Janet L. [4 ]
Stukel, Therese A. [5 ]
Walker-Corkery, Elizabeth [1 ]
Barry, Michael J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Med Practices Evaluat Ctr, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Canc Inst New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[3] Univ Connecticut, Ctr Hlth, Div Urol, Farmington, CT USA
[4] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Div Publ Hlth Sci, Programs Epidemiol & Prostate Canc, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[5] Inst Clin Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
prostate cancer; cancer screening; men's health; outcomes; practice variation;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-008-0785-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Prior to introduction of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test, the Seattle-Puget Sound and Connecticut Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) areas had similar prostate cancer mortality rates. Early in the PSA era (1987-1990), men in the Seattle area were screened and treated more intensively for prostate cancer than men in Connecticut. OBJECTIVE: We previously reported more intensive screening and treatment early in the PSA era did not lower prostate cancer mortality through 11 years and now extend follow-up to 15 years. DESIGN: Natural experiment comparing two fixed population-based cohorts. SUBJECTS: Male Medicare beneficiaries ages 65-79 from the Seattle (N = 94,900) and Connecticut (N = 120,621) SEER areas, followed from 1987-2001. MEASUREMENTS: Rates of prostate cancer screening; treatment with radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, and androgen deprivation therapy; and prostate cancer-specific mortality. MAIN RESULTS: The 15-year cumulative incidences of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy through 2001 were 2.84% and 6.02%, respectively, for Seattle cohort members, compared to 0.56% and 5.07% for Connecticut cohort members (odds ratio 5.20, 95% confidence interval 3.22 to 8.42 for surgery and odds ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval 0.98 to 1.58 for radiation). The cumulative incidence of androgen deprivation therapy from 1991-2001 was 4.78% for Seattle compared to 6.13% for Connecticut (odds ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 0.87). The adjusted rate ratio of prostate cancer mortality through 2001 was 1.02 (95% C.I. 0.96 to 1.09) in Seattle versus Connecticut. CONCLUSION: Among men aged 65 or older, more intensive prostate cancer screening early in the PSA era and more intensive treatment particularly with radical prostatectomy over 15 years of follow-up were not associated with lower prostate cancer-specific mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:1809 / 1814
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   The prostate cancer conundrum [J].
Albertsen, PC .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2003, 95 (13) :930-931
[2]   Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer [J].
Bill-Axelson, A ;
Holmberg, L ;
Ruutu, M ;
Häggman, M ;
Andersson, SO ;
Bratell, S ;
Spångberg, A ;
Busch, C ;
Nordling, S ;
Garmo, H ;
Palmgren, J ;
Adami, HO ;
Norlén, BJ ;
Johansson, JE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (19) :1977-1984
[3]   The effectiveness of screening for prostate cancer - A nested case-control study [J].
Concato, J ;
Wells, CK ;
Horwitz, RI ;
Penson, D ;
Fincke, G ;
Berlowitz, DR ;
Froehlich, G ;
Blake, D ;
Vickers, MA ;
Gehr, GA ;
Raheb, NH ;
Sullivan, G ;
Peduzzi, P .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 166 (01) :38-43
[4]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[5]   RELATION OF POOLED LOGISTIC-REGRESSION TO TIME-DEPENDENT COX REGRESSION-ANALYSIS - THE FRAMINGHAM HEART-STUDY [J].
DAGOSTINO, RB ;
LEE, ML ;
BELANGER, AJ ;
CUPPLES, LA ;
ANDERSON, K ;
KANNEL, WB .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1990, 9 (12) :1501-1515
[6]   Decreasing mortality rates for prostate cancer: possible role of hormonal therapy? [J].
Damber, JE .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 93 (06) :695-701
[7]  
Etzioni R, 2002, J NATL CANCER I, V94, P981
[8]   Cancer surveillance series: Interpreting trends in prostate cancer - Part II: Cause of death misclassification and the recent rise and fall in prostate cancer mortality [J].
Feuer, EJ ;
Merrill, RM ;
Hankey, BF .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1999, 91 (12) :1025-1032
[9]   Cancer surveillance series: Interpreting trends in prostate cancer - Part I: Evidence of the effects of screening in recent prostate cancer incidence, mortality, and survival rates [J].
Hankey, BF ;
Feuer, EJ ;
Clegg, LX ;
Hayes, RB ;
Legler, JM ;
Prorok, PC ;
Ries, LA ;
Merrill, RM ;
Kaplan, RS .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1999, 91 (12) :1017-1024
[10]   Natural experiment examining impact of aggressive screening and treatment on prostate cancer mortality in two fixed cohorts from Seattle area and Connecticut [J].
Lu-Yao, G ;
Albertsen, PC ;
Stanford, JL ;
Stukel, TA ;
Walker-Corkery, ES ;
Barry, MJ .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 325 (7367) :740-743