Dynamic hypothetical bias in discrete choice experiments: Evidence from measuring the impact of corporate social responsibility on consumers demand

被引:22
作者
Arana, Jorge E. [1 ,2 ]
Leon, Carmelo J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Inst Tourism & Sustainable Dev Econ TIDES, Las Palmas Gran Canaria 35017, Las Palmas, Spain
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Ctr Study Choice CenSoc, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
关键词
Hypothetical bias; Non-market valuation; Choice experiments; Corporate social responsibility; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; CONTINGENT VALUATION; CHEAP TALK; DECISION RULES; PREFERENCES; RELIABILITY; ELICITATION; DESIGN; EXPERIENCE; STABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.005
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This paper is aimed at studying the dynamics of consumers' preferences for corporate social responsibility. The data come from both a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) and a field experiment conducted in a real market setting. The results show that in a static setting (first month) predictions of a standard DCE study and real market shares are statistically similar for the various profiles of corporate social responsibility. However, as time evolves real market shares present some dynamic patterns that are not mirrored by the standard DCE predictions. The overall conclusion is that differences between real market behavior and DCE data can be attributed to the lack of learning experience or adaptation in DCE surveys rather than to the hypothetical nature of the experiments. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 61
页数:9
相关论文
共 75 条
[51]   What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values? [J].
List, JA ;
Gallet, CA .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2001, 20 (03) :241-254
[52]  
Little J., 2004, Econ Bull, V3, P1
[53]   Hedonic adaptation and the role of decision and experience utility in public policy [J].
Loewenstein, George ;
Ubel, Peter A. .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2008, 92 (8-9) :1795-1810
[54]   TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF THE CONTINGENT VALUATION METHOD - A COMPARISON OF GENERAL-POPULATION AND VISITOR RESPONSES [J].
LOOMIS, JB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1989, 71 (01) :76-84
[55]  
Louviere J.J., 2000, Stated Choice Models
[56]   Designing discrete choice experiments: Do optimal designs come at a price? [J].
Louviere, Jordan J. ;
Islam, Towhidul ;
Wasi, Nada ;
Street, Deborah ;
Burgess, Leonie .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2008, 35 (02) :360-375
[57]  
Lusk JL, 2009, LAND ECON, V85, P500
[58]   Bridging the gap between laboratory experiments and naturally occurring markets: An inferred valuation method [J].
Lusk, Jayson L. ;
Norwood, F. Bailey .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 58 (02) :236-250
[59]   Are choice experiments incentive compatible? A test with quality differentiated beef steaks [J].
Lusk, JL ;
Schroeder, TC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 86 (02) :467-482
[60]   Effects of cheap talk on consumer willingness-to-pay for golden rice [J].
Lusk, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 85 (04) :840-856