Development and Validation of Risk Prediction Models for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using Four Different Methods

被引:4
作者
Wang, Ning [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Haonan [3 ,4 ]
Jing, Yingyu [3 ,4 ]
Song, Lin [5 ]
Chen, Huan [3 ,4 ]
Wang, Mengjun [5 ,6 ]
Gao, Lei [1 ]
Huang, Lili [7 ]
Song, Yanan [1 ]
Sun, Bo [5 ]
Cui, Wei [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Xu, Jing [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Endocrinol, Xian 710004, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Int Ctr Obes & Metab Dis Res, Xian 710061, Peoples R China
[3] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Endocrinol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Xian 710061, Peoples R China
[4] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Geriatr 2, Affiliated Hosp 1, Xian 710061, Peoples R China
[5] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Physiol & Pathophysiol, Sch Basic Med Sci, Hlth Sci Ctr, Xian 710061, Peoples R China
[6] 521 Hosp Norinco Grp, Dept Endocrinol, Xian 710065, Peoples R China
[7] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Med Ultrasound, Affiliated Hosp 2, Xian 710004, Peoples R China
关键词
gestational diabetes mellitus; prediction models; risk factors; early pregnancy; ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY; ADVERSE PREGNANCY OUTCOMES; PROSPECTIVE COHORT; WEIGHT-GAIN; AGE; MENARCHE; 1ST; PREVALENCE; TRIMESTER; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.3390/metabo12111040
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), a common perinatal disease, is related to increased risks of maternal and neonatal adverse perinatal outcomes. We aimed to establish GDM risk prediction models that can be widely used in the first trimester using four different methods, including a score-scaled model derived from a meta-analysis using 42 studies, a logistic regression model, and two machine learning models (decision tree and random forest algorithms). The score-scaled model (seven variables) was established via a meta-analysis and a stratified cohort of 1075 Chinese pregnant women from the Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital (NWCH) and showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.772. The logistic regression model (seven variables) was established and validated using the above cohort and showed AUCs of 0.799 and 0.834 for the training and validation sets, respectively. Another two models were established using the decision tree (DT) and random forest (RF) algorithms and showed corresponding AUCs of 0.825 and 0.823 for the training set, and 0.816 and 0.827 for the validation set. The validation of the developed models suggested good performance in a cohort derived from another period. The score-scaled GDM prediction model, the logistic regression GDM prediction model, and the two machine learning GDM prediction models could be employed to identify pregnant women with a high risk of GDM using common clinical indicators, and interventions can be sought promptly.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative study between different biomarkers for early prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus
    Maged, Ahmed Mohamed
    Moety, Ghada Abdel Fattah
    Mostafa, Walaa Ahmed
    Hamed, Dalia Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2014, 27 (11) : 1108 - 1112
  • [32] Development, validation and clinical utility of a risk prediction model for adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes: The PeRSonal GDM model
    Cooray, Shamil D.
    Boyle, Jacqueline A.
    Soldatos, Georgia
    Allotey, John
    Wang, Holly
    Fernandez-Felix, Borja M.
    Zamora, Javier
    Thangaratinam, Shakila
    Teede, Helena J.
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2022, 52
  • [33] Prediction of recurrent gestational diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study
    Hahn, Stephan
    Koerber, Sabine
    Gerber, Bernd
    Stubert, Johannes
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2023, 307 (03) : 689 - 697
  • [34] Risk factors of gestational diabetes mellitus during assisted reproductive technology procedures
    Hu Shiqiao
    Xu Bei
    Zhang Yini
    Jin Lei
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2020, 36 (04) : 318 - 321
  • [35] Risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus among women screened with the two-step and one-step methods: A before-and-after study
    Hung, Tai-Ho
    Chu, Fu-Ling
    Hsieh, T'sang-T'ang
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 57 (05): : 668 - 671
  • [36] Endometriosis and gestational diabetes mellitus risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Perez-Lopez, Faustino R.
    Martinez-Dominguez, Samuel J.
    Vinas, Andrea
    Perez-Tambo, Raquel
    Lafita, Alberto
    Lajusticia, Hector
    Chedraui, Peter
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 34 (05) : 363 - 369
  • [37] Development and validation of gestational diabetes mellitus health literacy scale
    Gu, Ruting
    Sun, Tong
    Pan, Yueshuai
    Wang, Jingyuan
    Li, Qianqian
    Zhang, Yan
    Tang, Yalin
    Zhou, Haiqing
    Wei, Lili
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2024, 127
  • [38] Establishment and evaluation of a risk prediction model for gestational diabetes mellitus
    Lin, Qing
    Fang, Zhuan-Ji
    WORLD JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2023, 14 (10) : 1541 - 1550
  • [39] Early prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus using maternal demographic and clinical risk factors
    Wu, Yanqi
    Hamelmann, Paul
    van der Ven, Myrthe
    Asvadi, Sima
    van der Jagt, M. Beatrijs van der Hout
    Oei, S. Guid
    Mischi, Massimo
    Bergmans, Jan
    Long, Xi
    BMC RESEARCH NOTES, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [40] Risk Prediction Model of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in a Chinese Population Based on a Risk Scoring System
    Wang, Yanmei
    Ge, Zhijuan
    Chen, Lei
    Hu, Jun
    Zhou, Wenting
    Shen, Shanmei
    Zhu, Dalong
    Bi, Yan
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2021, 12 (06) : 1721 - 1734