Evaluating a graphical notation for modelling software development methodologies

被引:9
作者
Sousa, Kenia [1 ]
Vanderdonckt, Jean [1 ]
Henderson-Sellers, Brian [2 ]
Gonzalez-Perez, Cesar [3 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, Louvain Sch Management LSM, Informat Syst Unit ISYS, B-1348 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Sch Software, Fac Engn & Informat Technol, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[3] CSIC, Inst Heritage Sci Incipit, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Software development methodologies; Method engineering; Graphical notation; Cognitive dimensions;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvlc.2012.04.001
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This work aims at evaluating a graphical notation for modelling software (and other kinds of) development methodologies, thus demonstrating how useful the graphical aspects can be for sharing knowledge between the people responsible for documenting information and those responsible for understanding and putting it into practice. We acknowledge the importance of having a common set of symbols that can be used to create, use and disseminate information for a larger audience than is possible today with a variety of alternatives and lack of a common ground. Using a cognitive dimensions framework, we make a standard evaluation of the elements and diagrams of the notation proposed to support the ISO/IEC 24744 methodology metamodel standard, considering the trade-offs between different dimensions. We suggest improvements to this existing notation based on this analysis, in the context of improving communication between creators and users of methodologies. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 212
页数:18
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], UN MOD LANG SPEC VER
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Metamodelling for software engineering
[3]  
[Anonymous], 24744 ISOIEC
[4]  
Banks W.W., 1983, HUMAN ENG DESIGN CON
[5]  
Bertin J., 1983, SEMIOLOGY GRAPHICS D
[6]  
Blackwell A.F., 2003, HCI MODELS THEORIES, P103, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-155860808-5/50005-8
[7]  
Brinkkemper S., 1990, THESIS U NIJMEGEN
[8]  
Calleros J.M. Gonzalez, 2009, USABILITY ENG DESIGN
[9]  
CONSTANTINE LL, 1995, REPORT OBJECT ANAL D, V2, P20
[10]  
CONSTANTINE LL, 1995, REPORT OBJECT ANAL D, V2, P25