A generalized framework for Capacitance Resistance Models and a comparison with streamline allocation factors

被引:24
作者
de Holanda, Rafael Wanderley [1 ]
Gildin, Eduardo [1 ]
Jensen, Jerry L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Petr Engn Dept, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Univ Calgary, Chem & Petr Engn Dept, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
Capacitance Resistance Model; State-space equations; Systems identification; Streamlines; Waterflooding; INFER INTERWELL CONNECTIVITY; WELL-RATE FLUCTUATIONS; PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION; RESERVOIR CONNECTIVITY; WATERFLOODS; INJECTION; PRESSURES;
D O I
10.1016/j.petrol.2017.10.020
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The Capacitance Resistance Model (CRM) is a fast way for modeling and simulating gas and waterflood recovery processes, making it a useful tool for improving real-time flood management and reservoir analysis. The CRM is a material balance-based model that requires only injection and production history, which are the most readily available data gathered throughout the production life of a reservoir. In this work, state-space (SS) equations are derived to describe the dynamic behavior of several CRM representations as a multi-input/multi-output system (matrix representation), computing reservoir dynamics simultaneously as a single system with interactions between injectors and producers. Interwell connectivities, time constants and productivity indices are estimated using a grey-box system identification algorithm. The matrix form of the CRM history matching and a sensitivity analysis to the CRM parameters estimates are presented. This process is computationally fast and easy to apply in fields with a large number of wells. Two case studies validate the proposed methodology: (1) homogeneous reservoir with flow barriers; and (2) channelized reservoir. A comparison between streamline allocation factors and CRM interwell connectivities for every injector-producer pair in the case studies is included to clarify their physical meaning, similarities and differences. The results lead to the following findings: 1) there is a fair correlation between CRM interwell connectivities and streamline allocation factors but the CRM values correspond to the pressure support and can connect more distant injector-producer pairs. The streamline allocation factors reflect water front advance and are largely limited to adjacent wells; 2) the CRM is significantly less sensitive to noise in flowrates than in BHP measurements; and 3) Different CRM representations show important performance differences based on reservoir heterogeneity, input variations and noise levels.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 282
页数:23
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Inferring interwell connectivity only from well-rate fluctuations in waterfloods [J].
Albertoni, A ;
Lake, LW .
SPE RESERVOIR EVALUATION & ENGINEERING, 2003, 6 (01) :6-16
[2]  
Altaheini S., 2016, SPE ANN TECHN C EXH
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical informationtheoretic approach
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, SPE W REG M
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, SPE RES SIM S
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1979, MATH SCI ENG
[7]  
Apiwatcharoenkul W., 2016, SPE IAEE HYDR EC EV, DOI [10.2118/179992-MS, DOI 10.2118/179992-MS]
[8]   An electrical device for analyzing oil-reservoir behavior [J].
Bruce, WA .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF MINING AND METALLURGICAL ENGINEERS, 1943, 151 :112-124
[9]  
Cao F., 2011, THESIS
[10]  
Cao F., 2014, THESIS