Advantages of randomization in coherent quantum dynamical control

被引:33
|
作者
Santos, Lea F. [1 ]
Viola, Lorenza [2 ]
机构
[1] Yeshiva Univ, Dept Phys, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] Dartmouth Coll, Dept Phys & Astron, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
来源
NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS | 2008年 / 10卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1088/1367-2630/10/8/083009
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Control scenarios have been identified where the use of randomized design may substantially improve the performance of dynamical decoupling methods (Santos and Viola 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 150501). Here, by focusing on the suppression of internal unwanted interactions in closed quantum systems, we review and further elaborate on the advantages of randomization at long evolution times. By way of illustration, special emphasis is devoted to isolated Heisenberg chains of coupled spin-1/2 particles. In particular, for nearest-neighbor interactions, two types of decoupling cycles are contrasted: inefficient averaging, whereby the number of control actions increases exponentially with the system size, and efficient averaging associated to a fixed-size control group. The latter allows for analytical and numerical studies of efficient decoupling schemes created by exploiting and merging together randomization and deterministic strategies, such as symmetrization, concatenation and cyclic permutations. Notably, sequences capable of removing interactions up to third order in the achievable control timescale are explicitly constructed, and a numerical algorithm to search for optimal decoupling sequences is proposed. The consequences of faulty controls in deterministic versus randomized schemes are also analyzed.
引用
收藏
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coherent dynamical control of quantum processes
    Rezvani, V
    Rezakhani, A. T.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2021, 104 (01)
  • [2] Coherent control of open quantum dynamical systems
    Altafini, C
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2004, 70 (06): : 062321 - 1
  • [3] Randomized dynamical decoupling techniques for coherent quantum control
    Viola, L.
    Santos, L. F.
    JOURNAL OF MODERN OPTICS, 2006, 53 (16-17) : 2559 - 2568
  • [4] FROM COHERENT TO INCOHERENT DYNAMICAL CONTROL OF OPEN QUANTUM SYSTEMS
    Kurizki, Gershon
    Zwick, Analia
    ADVANCES IN CHEMICAL PHYSICS, VOL 159, 2016, 159 : 137 - 217
  • [5] Quantum error correction of coherent errors by randomization
    O. Kern
    G. Alber
    D. L. Shepelyansky
    The European Physical Journal D - Atomic, Molecular, Optical and Plasma Physics, 2005, 32 : 153 - 156
  • [6] Quantum error correction of coherent errors by randomization
    Kern, O
    Alber, G
    Shepelyansky, DL
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL D, 2005, 32 (01): : 153 - 156
  • [7] Advantages of Coherent Feedback for Cooling Quantum Oscillators
    Hamerly, Ryan
    Mabuchi, Hideo
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2012, 109 (17)
  • [8] OPTIMAL-CONTROL OF COHERENT WAVE-FUNCTIONS - A LINEARIZED QUANTUM DYNAMICAL VIEW
    SHEN, LY
    SHI, SH
    RABITZ, H
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1993, 97 (47): : 12114 - 12121
  • [9] Coherent quantum LQG control
    Nurdin, Hendra I.
    James, Matthew R.
    Petersen, Ian R.
    AUTOMATICA, 2009, 45 (08) : 1837 - 1846
  • [10] Coherent control of quantum localization
    Holthaus, M
    COHERENT CONTROL IN ATOMS, MOLECULES, AND SEMICONDUCTORS, 1999, : 171 - 182