Dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pancreatic malignancies

被引:21
|
作者
Ali, Arif N. [1 ,2 ]
Dhabaan, Anees H. [1 ,2 ]
Jarrio, Christie S. [1 ,2 ]
Siddiqi, Arsalan K. [1 ,2 ]
Landry, Jerome C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Winship Canc Inst, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
RapidArc; Pancreas; VMAT; IMRT; STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY; FIXED FIELD IMRT; HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY; PHASE-II; UNRESECTABLE ADENOCARCINOMA; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER; RAPIDARC; CARCINOMA; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2011.10.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has been previously evaluated for several tumor sites and has been shown to provide significant dosimetric and delivery benefits when compared with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). To date, there have been no published full reports on the benefits of VMAT use in pancreatic patients compared with IMRT. Ten patients with pancreatic malignancies treated with either IMRT or VMAT were retrospectively identified. Both a double-arc VMAT and a 7-field IMRT plan were generated for each of the 10 patients using the same defined tumor volumes, organs at risk (OAR) volumes, dose, fractionation, and optimization constraints. The planning tumor volume (PTV) maximum dose (55.8 Gy vs. 54.4 Gy), PTV mean dose (53.9 Gy vs. 52.1 Gy), and conformality index (1.11 vs. 0.99) were statistically similar between the IMRT and VMAT plans, respectively. The VMAT plans had a statistically significant reduction in monitor units compared with the IMRT plans (1109 vs. 498, p < 0.001). In addition, the doses to the liver, small bowel, and spinal cord were comparable between the IMRT and VMAT plans. However, the VMAT plans demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the mean left kidney V-25 (9.4 Gy vs. 2.3 Gy, p = 0.018), mean right kidney V-15 (53.4 Gy vs. 45.9 Gy, p = 0.035), V-20 (32.2 Gy vs. 25.5 Gy, p = 0.016), and V-25 (21.7 Gy vs. 14.9 Gy, p = 0.001). VMAT was investigated in patients with pancreatic malignancies and compared with the current standard of IMRT. VMAT was found to have similar or improved dosimetric parameters for all endpoints considered. Specifically, VMAT provided reduced monitor units and improved bilateral kidney normal tissue dose. The clinical relevance of these benefits in the context of pancreatic cancer patients, however, is currently unclear and requires further investigation. (C) 2012 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 275
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Is volumetric modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) better than intensity modulated radiotherapy for gynecological malignancies A dosimetric comparison
    Sharma, Manoj Kumar
    Mitra, Swarupa
    Saxena, Upasna
    Bhushan, Manindra
    Shrivastava, Himanshu
    Simson, David K.
    Dewan, Abhinav
    Chauhan, Deepika
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2014, 10 (04) : 883 - 888
  • [32] A dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy with step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
    Mellon, Eric A.
    Javedan, Khosrow
    Strom, Tobin J.
    Moros, Eduardo G.
    Biagioli, Matthew C.
    Fernandez, Daniel C.
    Wasserman, Stu G.
    Wilder, Richard B.
    PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 5 (01) : 11 - 15
  • [33] Dosimetric comparison of magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy, intensity-modulated proton therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for distal esophageal cancer
    Barsky, Andrew R.
    George, Jerry
    Wroe, Andrew J.
    Mittauer, Kathryn E.
    Kaiser, Adeel
    Herrera, Roberto
    Yu, Jen
    Gutierrez, Alonso N.
    Alvarez, Diane
    McCulloch, James
    Kasper, Michael E.
    Mehta, Minesh P.
    Chuong, Michael D.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2024, 49 (02) : 121 - 126
  • [34] Intensity modulated radiation therapy versus volumetric intensity modulated arc therapy
    Rana, Suresh
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2013, 60 (03): : 81 - 83
  • [35] Dosimetric comparison of constant dose rate volumetric modulated arc therapy (CDR-VMAT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for gallbladder cancer
    Gedam, Varsha R.
    Pradhan, Anirudh
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2022, 21 (02) : 228 - 233
  • [36] Validation of Delivery Consistency for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Plans
    Woon, Wui Ann
    Ravindran, Paul B.
    Ekayanake, Piyasiri
    Lim, Yivonne Yih Fang
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 43 (02) : 119 - 128
  • [37] Dosimetry Test of TaiChi Accelerator Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy
    Tingtian, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2024, 120 (02): : E193 - E193
  • [38] VOLUMETRIC ARC INTENSITY-MODULATED THERAPY FOR SPINE BODY RADIOTHERAPY: COMPARISON WITH STATIC INTENSITY-MODULATED TREATMENT
    Wu, Q. Jackie
    Yoo, Sua
    Kirkpatrick, John P.
    Thongphiew, Danthai
    Yin, Fang-Fang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (05): : 1596 - 1604
  • [39] Dosimetric Comparison of Automated Non-Coplanar Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy in Angiosarcoma of the Scalp
    Inui, S.
    Tomita, N.
    Takaoka, T.
    Ueda, Y.
    Ohira, S.
    Tsuchiya, T.
    Miyazaki, M.
    Nishio, T.
    Koizumi, M.
    Konishi, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 117 (02): : E675 - E675
  • [40] Dosimetric Comparison of the Newest Version Tomotherapy, Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy, and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Plans for Angiosarcoma of the Scalp
    Mizuno, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E10 - E10