Dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pancreatic malignancies

被引:21
作者
Ali, Arif N. [1 ,2 ]
Dhabaan, Anees H. [1 ,2 ]
Jarrio, Christie S. [1 ,2 ]
Siddiqi, Arsalan K. [1 ,2 ]
Landry, Jerome C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Winship Canc Inst, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
RapidArc; Pancreas; VMAT; IMRT; STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY; FIXED FIELD IMRT; HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY; PHASE-II; UNRESECTABLE ADENOCARCINOMA; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER; RAPIDARC; CARCINOMA; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2011.10.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has been previously evaluated for several tumor sites and has been shown to provide significant dosimetric and delivery benefits when compared with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). To date, there have been no published full reports on the benefits of VMAT use in pancreatic patients compared with IMRT. Ten patients with pancreatic malignancies treated with either IMRT or VMAT were retrospectively identified. Both a double-arc VMAT and a 7-field IMRT plan were generated for each of the 10 patients using the same defined tumor volumes, organs at risk (OAR) volumes, dose, fractionation, and optimization constraints. The planning tumor volume (PTV) maximum dose (55.8 Gy vs. 54.4 Gy), PTV mean dose (53.9 Gy vs. 52.1 Gy), and conformality index (1.11 vs. 0.99) were statistically similar between the IMRT and VMAT plans, respectively. The VMAT plans had a statistically significant reduction in monitor units compared with the IMRT plans (1109 vs. 498, p < 0.001). In addition, the doses to the liver, small bowel, and spinal cord were comparable between the IMRT and VMAT plans. However, the VMAT plans demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the mean left kidney V-25 (9.4 Gy vs. 2.3 Gy, p = 0.018), mean right kidney V-15 (53.4 Gy vs. 45.9 Gy, p = 0.035), V-20 (32.2 Gy vs. 25.5 Gy, p = 0.016), and V-25 (21.7 Gy vs. 14.9 Gy, p = 0.001). VMAT was investigated in patients with pancreatic malignancies and compared with the current standard of IMRT. VMAT was found to have similar or improved dosimetric parameters for all endpoints considered. Specifically, VMAT provided reduced monitor units and improved bilateral kidney normal tissue dose. The clinical relevance of these benefits in the context of pancreatic cancer patients, however, is currently unclear and requires further investigation. (C) 2012 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 275
页数:5
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] A dosimetric analysis of dose escalation using two intensity-modulated radiation therapy techniques in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma
    Brown, Michael W.
    Ning, Holly
    Arora, Barbara
    Albert, Paul S.
    Poggi, Matthew
    Camphausen, Kevin
    Citrin, Deborah
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 65 (01): : 274 - 283
  • [2] A comparison between intensity Modulated Arc Therapy (IMAT) and tomotherapy
    Cao, D.
    Earl, M.
    Holmes, T.
    Shepard, D.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2052 - 2052
  • [3] Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Unresectable Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas
    Chang, Daniel T.
    Schellenberg, Devin
    Shen, John
    Kim, Jeff
    Goodman, Karyn A.
    Fisher, George A.
    Ford, James M.
    Desser, Terry
    Quon, Andrew
    Koong, Albert C.
    [J]. CANCER, 2009, 115 (03) : 665 - 672
  • [4] Preliminary experience of helical tomotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Chargari, Cyrus
    Campana, Francois
    Beuzeboc, Philippe
    Zefkili, Sofia
    Kirova, Youlia M.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 15 (35) : 4444 - 4445
  • [5] Volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy for carcinomas of the anal canal: A treatment planning comparison with fixed field IMRT
    Clivio, Alessandro
    Fogliata, Antonella
    Franzetti-Pellanda, Alessandra
    Nicolini, Giorgia
    Vanetti, Eugenio
    Wyttenbach, Rolf
    Cozzi, Luca
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2009, 92 (01) : 118 - 124
  • [6] A randomized Phase III study of radiotherapy alone or with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin-C in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: Eastern cooperative oncology group study E8282
    Cohen, SJ
    Dobelbower, R
    Lipsitz, S
    Catalano, PJ
    Sischy, B
    Smith, TJ
    Haller, DG
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 62 (05): : 1345 - 1350
  • [7] A treatment planning study comparing volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc and fixed field IMRT for cervix uteri radiotherapy
    Cozzi, Luca
    Dinshaw, Ketayun Ardeshir
    Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore
    Mahantshetty, Umesh
    Engineer, Reena
    Deshpande, Deepak Dattatray
    Jamema, S. V.
    Vanetti, Eugenio
    Clivio, Alessandro
    Nicolini, Giorgia
    Fogliata, Antonella
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 89 (02) : 180 - 191
  • [8] Phase I study of concomitant gemcitabine and IMRT for patients with unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head
    Crane, CH
    Antolak, JA
    Rosen, II
    Forster, KM
    Evans, DB
    Janjan, NA
    Charnsangavej, C
    Pisters, PWT
    Lenzi, R
    Papagikos, MA
    Wolff, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER, 2001, 30 (03) : 123 - 132
  • [9] Conventional IMRT versus Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (RapidArc) for Pancreatic Cancer
    Eppinga, W.
    Lagerwaard, F. J.
    Verbakel, W. F. A. R.
    Slotman, B. J.
    Senan, S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (03): : S712 - S712
  • [10] On the performances of Intensity Modulated Protons, RapidArc and Helical Tomotherapy for selected paediatric cases
    Fogliata, Antonella
    Yartsev, Slav
    Nicolini, Giorgia
    Clivio, Alessandro
    Vanetti, Eugenio
    Wyttenbach, Rolf
    Bauman, Glenn
    Cozzi, Luca
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2009, 4