Quantitative risk assessment of an urban hydrogen refueling station

被引:139
作者
Gye, Hye-Ri [1 ]
Seo, Seung-Kwon [1 ]
Bach, Quang-Vu [1 ]
Ha, Daeguen [2 ]
Lee, Chul-Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chung Ang Univ, Sch Chem Engn & Mat Sci, 84 Heukseok Ro, Seoul 06974, South Korea
[2] Korea Gas Safety Corp, Fire Explos Res Dept, Yeongwol Gun 146751, Gangwon Do, South Korea
关键词
Quantitative risk assessment (QRA); Hydrogen refueling station; Urban; Mitigation; Safety; FUELING STATIONS; EXPLOSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.11.035
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Hydrogen is one of important energy source in the next generation of renewable energy. It has powerful strength such as no emission from CO2 for fuel, Nevertheless, many countries have difficulties to expand hydrogen infra due to high risky from hydrogen. Especially, the hydrogen refueling station which is located in urban area has congested structure and high population around, it has higher risk than conventional refueling station. This paper presents a quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of a high pressure hydrogen refueling station in an urban area with a large population and high congestion between the instruments and equipment. The results show that leaks from the tube-trailer and dispenser as well as potential explosion of the tube-trailer are the main risks. For the safety of the station operator, customers and people surrounding the refueling station, additional mitigation plans such as adding additional safety barrier system have to be implemented on the compressor and dispenser in order to prevent continuous release of hydrogen from an accident. (C) 2018 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1288 / 1298
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Alcock JL, 2001, 2 EUR INT HYDR PROJ
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, 18E CPR BOOK PURPL G
[3]   Application of domino effect quantitative risk assessment to an extended industrial area [J].
Antonioni, Giacomo ;
Spadoni, Gigliola ;
Cozzani, Valerio .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2009, 22 (05) :614-624
[4]   A model for estimating the impact of the domino effect on accident frequencies in quantitative risk assessments of storage facilities [J].
Bernechea, Esteban J. ;
Antonio Vilchez, Juan ;
Arnaldos, Josep .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2013, 91 (06) :423-437
[5]  
Chitose K, 2006, WHEC, V16, P13
[6]   Quantitative risk analysis of fire and explosion on the top-side LNG-liquefaction process of LNG-FPSO [J].
Dan, Seungkyu ;
Lee, Chang Jun ;
Park, Jeongpil ;
Shin, Dongil ;
Yoon, En Sup .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2014, 92 (05) :430-441
[7]   An international comparison of four quantitative risk assessment approaches-A benchmark study based on a fictitious LPG plant [J].
Gooijer, L. ;
Cornil, N. ;
Lenoble, C. L. .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2012, 90 (02) :101-107
[8]   Analysis of jet flames and unignited jets from unintended releases of hydrogen [J].
Houf, W. G. ;
Evans, G. H. ;
Schefer, R. W. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2009, 34 (14) :5961-5969
[9]   Study on the diaphragm fracture in a diaphragm compressor for a hydrogen refueling station [J].
Jia, Xiaohan ;
Chen, Jiahao ;
Wu, Han ;
Peng, Xueyuan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2016, 41 (15) :6412-6421
[10]   A method of quantitative risk assessment for transmission pipeline carrying natural gas [J].
Jo, YD ;
Ahn, BJ .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2005, 123 (1-3) :1-12