Land use trade-offs for flood protection: A choice experiment with visualizations

被引:46
作者
Ryffel, Andrea Nathalie [1 ]
Rid, Wolfgang [2 ,3 ]
Gret-Regamey, Adrienne [1 ]
机构
[1] ETH, Inst Landscape & Spatial Dev, PLUS, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Stuttgart, Inst Urban Planning & Design, D-70174 Stuttgart, Germany
[3] Univ Appl Sci Erfurt, Fac Architecture & Urban Planning, D-99089 Erfurt, Germany
关键词
Land use trade-offs; Hydrological ecosystem services; Flood protection; Choice experiment; 3D-visualization; Mountain catchment; FOREST REGROWTH; SCENIC BEAUTY; WATER YIELD; PREFERENCE; CLIMATE; MODELS; IMPACTS; RIVER; IMPROVEMENTS; VALUATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.09.008
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Hydrological processes respond to changes in land use. Thus, hydrological ecosystem services can be affected by land use trade-offs and need to be considered in both land use management and water management. In this paper we present a choice experiment study from a medium-sized mountainous catchment area in Switzerland investigating individual preferences for long-term land use changes. The study focuses On trade-offs concerning reforestation, settlement development, and river management and on resulting effects on flow regulation and flood protection ecosystem services. Furthermore, the study investigates the influence of political choice recommendations on individual choice behavior. We report three major results: (1) Respondents showed clear but heterogeneous preferences for long-term land use changes. (2) Respondents were willing to trade off extensive agricultural land for flood protection ecosystem services, namely through reforestation and widening of the riverine zone. (3) Choice recommendations by political parties and interest groups did influence individual choice behavior in Discrete Choice Experiments but did not, as expected, decrease implicit benefit estimates. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 123
页数:13
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [1] 3D Nature LLC, 2012, 3D LANDSC DES VIS SO
  • [2] Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation
    Adamowicz, W
    Boxall, P
    Williams, M
    Louviere, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (01) : 64 - 75
  • [3] Alberini A., 2006, Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies. A Common Sense Approach to Theory and Practice, P203
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2002, Discrete choice methods with simulation
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2003, BIOGEME FREE PACKAGE
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2010, ArcGIS 10
  • [7] Arnold M., 2009, MEHRWERT NATURNAHER
  • [8] BAFU B.F.U., 2003, BERICHTE BWG, P209
  • [9] A sight for sore eyes: Assessing the value of view and land use in the housing market
    Baranzini, Andrea
    Schaerer, Caroline
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOUSING ECONOMICS, 2011, 20 (03) : 191 - 199
  • [10] Reducing gain-loss asymmetry: A virtual reality choice experiment valuing land use change
    Bateman, Ian J.
    Day, Brett H.
    Jones, Andrew P.
    Jude, Simon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 58 (01) : 106 - 118