共 37 条
Defining incident cases of epilepsy in administrative data
被引:22
作者:
Bakaki, Paul M.
[1
]
Koroukian, Siran M.
[1
]
Jackson, Leila W.
[1
]
Albert, Jeffrey M.
[1
]
Kaiboriboon, Kitti
[2
]
机构:
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Univ Hosp Cleveland, Dept Neurol, Case Med Ctr, Epilepsy Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词:
Incidence;
Administrative data;
Epilepsy;
SEIZURE-FREE PATIENTS;
ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUG-WITHDRAWAL;
CURRENT CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE;
NEW-ONSET EPILEPSY;
UNCONTROLLED EPILEPSY;
UNPROVOKED SEIZURES;
HEALTH;
CARE;
DISCONTINUATION;
DISPARITIES;
D O I:
10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2013.05.005
中图分类号:
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Purpose: To determine the minimum enrollment duration for identifying incident cases of epilepsy in administrative data. Methods: We performed a retrospective dynamic cohort study using Ohio Medicaid data from 1992 to 2006 to identify a total of 5037 incident epilepsy cases who had at least 1 year of follow-up prior to epilepsy diagnosis (epilepsy-free interval). The incidence for epilepsy-free intervals from 1 to 8 years, overall and stratified by pre-existing disability status, was examined. The graphical approach between the slopes of incidence estimates and the epilepsy-free intervals was used to identify the minimum epilepsy-free interval that minimized misclassification of prevalent as incident epilepsy cases. Results: As the length of epilepsy-free interval increased, the incidence rates decreased. A graphical plot showed that the decline in incidence of epilepsy became nearly flat beyond the third epilepsy-free interval. Conclusion: The minimum of 3-year epilepsy-free interval is needed to differentiate incident from prevalent cases in administrative data. Shorter or longer epilepsy-free intervals could result in over- or under-estimation of epilepsy incidence. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 279
页数:7
相关论文