Strategic alignment and value maximization for IT project portfolios

被引:23
作者
Chiang, I. Robert [1 ]
Nunez, Manuel A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Fordham Univ, Gabelli Sch Business, Bronx, NY 10458 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Sch Business, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
关键词
IT project management; Project portfolio management; Strategic alignment; Project synergy; Multi-objective optimization; Evolutionary algorithms; RESOURCE-ALLOCATION; SELECTION; RISK; METHODOLOGY; INFORMATION; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; CAPACITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s10799-012-0126-9
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Managing project portfolios has been a challenge to many IT organizations due to the size and complexity of their initiatives that are often cross-functional, fast changing, and transformational in nature. A governance process on project solicitation, evaluation, and monitoring is thus essential to ensure the resulting portfolio creates tangible values, balances across priorities, and supports business objectives. An optimization model to streamline the decision processes for IT portfolios and programs is proposed. We consider project characteristics such as the extent of strategic alignment, expected benefit, development cost, and cross-project synergy to maximize the portfolio value. We also consider team proficiency and resource availability to determine a project portfolio that could be implemented within the overall development time. The multi-objective model identifies the optimal mix among project types and the solution procedure efficiently produces recommendations that are superior to those found with current empirical techniques. We also describe an evolutionary algorithm to find approximate solutions to the optimization model. Possible extensions on how the optimization procedure can go beyond projects to also streamline decisions such as the renewal or replacement of in-flight applications is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 157
页数:15
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   MODEL FOR SELECTION OF INTERDEPENDENT R AND D PROJECTS [J].
AAKER, DA ;
TYEBJEE, TT .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1978, 25 (02) :30-36
[2]   Risk management in ERP project introduction: Review of the literature [J].
Aloini, Davide ;
Dulmin, Riccardo ;
Mininno, Valeria .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2007, 44 (06) :547-567
[3]  
Apfel AL, 2009, G00167564 GARTN INC
[4]   Project assignments when budget padding taints resource allocation [J].
Arya, Anil ;
Mittendorf, Brian .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2006, 52 (09) :1345-1358
[5]  
Bardhan IR, 2006, P 39 HAW INT C SYST, p168b
[6]   A case for using real options pricing analysis to evaluate information technology project investments [J].
Benaroch, M ;
Kauffman, RJ .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 1999, 10 (01) :70-86
[7]   KNOWLEDGE-BASED PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS FOR PROJECT EVALUATION [J].
BOHANEC, M ;
RAJKOVIC, V ;
SEMOLIC, B ;
POGACNIK, A .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 1995, 28 (05) :293-302
[8]   Project selection, scheduling and resource allocation with time dependent returns [J].
Chen, Jiaqiong ;
Askin, Ronald G. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 193 (01) :23-34
[9]   Resource allocation in stochastic, finite-capacity, multi-project systems through the cross entropy methodology [J].
Cohen, Izack ;
Golany, Boaz ;
Shtub, Avraham .
JOURNAL OF SCHEDULING, 2007, 10 (03) :181-193
[10]   A framework for ex ante project risk assessment based on absorptive capacity [J].
Cuellar, Michael J. ;
Gallivan, Michael J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 173 (03) :1123-1138