The Role of Socioeconomic Status in SAT-Grade Relationships and in College Admissions Decisions

被引:52
作者
Sackett, Paul R. [1 ]
Kuncel, Nathan R. [1 ]
Beatty, Adam S. [1 ]
Rigdon, Jana L. [1 ]
Shen, Winny [1 ]
Kiger, Thomas B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
educational measurement; individual differences; socioeconomic status; test validity; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1177/0956797612438732
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This article examines the role of socioeconomic status (SES) in the relationships among college admissions-test scores, secondary school grades, and subsequent academic performance. Scores on the SAT (a test widely used in the admissions process in the United States), secondary school grades, college grades, and SES measures from 143,606 students at 110 colleges and universities were examined, and results of these analyses were compared with results obtained using a 41-school data set including scores from the prior version of the SAT and using University of California data from prior research on the role of SES. In all the data sets, the SAT showed incremental validity over secondary school grades in predicting subsequent academic performance, and this incremental relationship was not substantially affected by controlling for SES. The SES of enrolled students was very similar to that of specific schools' applicant pools, which suggests that the barrier to college for low-SES students in the United States is a lower rate of entering the college admissions process, rather than exclusion on the part of colleges.
引用
收藏
页码:1000 / 1007
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Fair game? The use of standardized admissions tests in higher education
[2]  
Atkinson R. C., 2009, ANN M AM FDN RES ASS
[3]   Reflections on a Century of College Admissions Tests [J].
Atkinson, Richard C. ;
Geiser, Saul .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2009, 38 (09) :665-676
[4]   Individual Differences in Course Choice Result in Underestimation of the Validity of College Admissions Systems [J].
Berry, Christopher M. ;
Sackett, Paul R. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (07) :822-830
[5]  
Bowen William, 2009, CROSSING FINISH LINE
[6]  
Cabrera A.F., 2000, Understanding the college choice of disadvantaged students. New Directions for Institutional Research, P5, DOI DOI 10.1002/IR.10701
[7]  
Geiser S., 2001, SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
[8]  
Geiser S., 2002, Educational Assessment, V8, P1, DOI [10.1207/S15326977EA080101, DOI 10.1207/S15326977EA080101, DOI 10.1207/S15326977EA0801_01]
[9]  
Hezlett S., 2001, ANN M NAT COUNC MEAS
[10]  
Hossler D.J., 1999, GOING COLL SOCIAL EC