Network meta-analysis of individual and aggregate level data

被引:72
作者
Jansen, Jeroen P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, MAPI Consultancy, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/jrsm.1048
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Network meta-analysis is often performed with aggregate-level data (AgD). A challenge in using AgD is that the association between a patient-level covariate and treatment effects at the study level may not reflect the individual-level effect modification. In this paper, non-linear network meta-analysis models for combining individual patient data (IPD) and AgD are presented to reduce bias and uncertainty of direct and indirect treatment effects in the presence of heterogeneity. The first method uses the same model form for IPD and AgD. With the second method, the model for AgD is obtained by integrating an underlying IPD model over the joint within-study distribution of covariates, in line with the method by Jackson et al. for ecological inferences. With simulated examples, the models are illustrated. Having IPD for a subset of studies improves estimation of treatment effects in the presence of patient-level heterogeneity. Of the two proposed nonlinear models for combining IPD and AgD, the second seems less affected by bias in situations with large treatment-by-patient-level-covariate interactions, probably at the cost of greater uncertainty. Additional studies are needed to better understand when one model is favorable over the other. For network meta-analysis, it is recommended to use IPD when available. Copyright (C) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 190
页数:14
相关论文
共 28 条
[21]   Meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using individual patient data and aggregate data [J].
Riley, Richard D. ;
Dodd, Susanna R. ;
Craig, Jean V. ;
Thompson, John R. ;
Williamson, Paula R. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (29) :6111-6136
[22]   Evaluation of networks of randomized trials [J].
Salanti, Georgia ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. ;
Ades, A. E. ;
Ioannidis, John P. A. .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2008, 17 (03) :279-301
[23]   Evaluating novel agent effects in multiple-treatments meta-regression [J].
Salanti, Georgia ;
Dias, Sofia ;
Welton, Nicky J. ;
Ades, A. E. ;
Golfinopoulos, Vassilis ;
Kyrgiou, Maria ;
Mauri, Davide ;
Ioannidis, John P. A. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (23) :2369-2383
[24]   A case study of multiple-treatments meta-analysis demonstrates that covariates should be considered [J].
Salanti, Georgia ;
Marinho, Valeria ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 62 (08) :857-864
[25]   Meta-regression detected associations between heterogeneous treatment effects and study-level, but not patient-level, factors [J].
Schmid, CH ;
Stark, PC ;
Berlin, JA ;
Landais, P ;
Lau, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 57 (07) :683-697
[26]  
Spiegelhalter D., 2003, WINBUGS USER MANUAL
[27]   Meta-analysis of individual- and aggregate-level data [J].
Sutton, A. J. ;
Kendrick, D. ;
Coupland, C. A. C. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (05) :651-669
[28]   Sensitivity analyses for ecological regression [J].
Wakefield, J .
BIOMETRICS, 2003, 59 (01) :9-17