How to model an institution

被引:95
作者
Mohr, John W. [1 ]
White, Harrison C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Sociol, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[2] Dept Sociol, New York, NY 10027 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s11186-008-9066-0
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Institutions are linkage mechanisms that bridge across three kinds of social divides-they link micro systems of social interaction to meso (and macro) levels of organization, they connect the symbolic with the material, and the agentic with the structural. Two key analytic principles are identified for empirical research, relationality and duality. These are linked to new research strategies for the study of institutions that draw on network analytic techniques. Two hypotheses are suggested. (1) Institutional resilience is directly correlated to the overall degree of structural linkages that bridge across domains of level, meaning, and agency. (2) Institutional change is related to over-bridging, defined as the sustained juxtaposition of multiple styles within the same institutional site. Case examples are used to test these contentions. Institutional stability is examined in the case of Indian caste systems and American academic science. Institutional change is explored in the case of the rise of the early Christian church and in the origins of rock and roll music.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 512
页数:28
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]  
Abbott A., 1988, SYSTEM PROFESSIONS E
[2]  
Abell Peter., 1987, SYNTAX SOCIAL LIFE
[3]  
[Anonymous], ORTHODOXY CATHOLICIT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1989, SOCIAL CONTROL MULTI
[5]  
[Anonymous], APOSTOLIC MINISTRY
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, STANFORD ENCY PHILOS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Research Methods in Social Network Analysis
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Matters of culture: Cultural sociology in practice
[9]  
[Anonymous], SCI ANAL VALUES
[10]  
[Anonymous], PRINCIPALS AGENTS ST