Red Ink in the Rearview Mirror: Local Fiscal Conditions and the Issuance of Traffic Tickets

被引:63
作者
Garrett, Thomas A. [1 ]
Wagner, Gary A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Fed Reserve Bank St Louis, St Louis, MO USA
[2] Univ Arkansas, Little Rock, AR 72204 USA
关键词
LAWS; ENFORCEMENT; POLICE;
D O I
10.1086/589702
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Municipalities have revenue motives for enforcing traffic laws in addition to public-safety motives because many traffic offenses are punished via fines and the issuing municipality often retains the revenue. Anecdotal evidence supports this revenue motive. We empirically test the revenue motive using a panel of annual data for North Carolina counties from 1990 to 2003. We find that significantly more tickets are issued in the year following a decline in revenue but that the issuance of traffic tickets does not decline in years following revenue increases. Elasticity estimates reveal that a 10 percent decrease in negative revenue growth results in a 6.4 percent increase in the growth rate of traffic tickets. Our results suggest that tickets are used as a revenue-generation tool rather than solely a means to increase public safety.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 90
页数:20
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Finders keepers: Forfeiture laws, policing incentives, and local budgets [J].
Baicker, Katherine ;
Jacobson, Mireille .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2007, 91 (11-12) :2113-2136
[2]   THE PUBLIC-INTEREST HYPOTHESIS REVISITED - A NEW TEST OF PELTZMAN THEORY OF REGULATION [J].
BECKER, G .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 1986, 49 (03) :223-234
[3]  
BERNSTEIN A, 1999, HOUSTON CHRONIC 1213
[4]  
Blincoe L., 2002, EC IMPACT MOTOR VEHI
[5]   Policing for profit: The drug war's hidden economic agenda [J].
Blumenson, E ;
Nilsen, E .
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW, 1998, 65 (01) :35-114
[6]  
BRUNORI D, 2006, STATE TAX POLICY POL
[7]  
BURNETT J, 2001, MILWAUKEE J SEN 0330
[8]  
CHIAPPORI PA, 2001, HDB INSURANCE, P365
[9]  
Cirincione Carmen., 1999, PUBLIC BUDGETING FIN, V19, P26
[10]   CRIME AND THE BUSINESS-CYCLE [J].
COOK, PJ ;
ZARKIN, GA .
JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 1985, 14 (01) :115-128