Mammographic density and breast cancer: a comparison of related and unrelated controls in the Breast Cancer Family Registry

被引:4
作者
Linton, Linda [1 ]
Martin, Lisa J. [1 ]
Li, Qing [1 ]
Huszti, Ella [1 ]
Minkin, Salomon [1 ]
John, Esther M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Rommens, Johanna [5 ]
Paterson, Andrew D. [6 ]
Boyd, Norman F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ontario Canc Inst, Campbell Family Inst Breast Canc Res, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[2] Canc Prevent Inst Calif, Fremont, CA 94538 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Res & Policy, Div Epidemiol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Stanford Canc Inst, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[5] Hosp Sick Children, Program Genet & Genom Biol, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada
来源
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH | 2013年 / 15卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Mammographic density; case-control study; overmatching; case control; UNITED-STATES; RISK-FACTOR; HISTORY;
D O I
10.1186/bcr3430
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Percent mammographic density (PMD) is a strong and highly heritable risk factor for breast cancer. Studies of the role of PMD in familial breast cancer may require controls, such as the sisters of cases, selected from the same 'risk set' as the cases. The use of sister controls would allow control for factors that have been shown to influence risk of breast cancer such as race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status and a family history of breast cancer, but may introduce 'overmatching' and attenuate case-control differences in PMD. Methods: To examine the potential effects of using sister controls rather than unrelated controls in a case-control study, we examined PMD in triplets, each comprised of a case with invasive breast cancer, an unaffected full sister control, and an unaffected unrelated control. Both controls were matched to cases on age at mammogram. Total breast area and dense area in the mammogram were measured in the unaffected breast of cases and a randomly selected breast in controls, and the non-dense area and PMD calculated from these measurements. Results: The mean difference in PMD between cases and controls, and the standard deviation (SD) of the difference, were slightly less for sister controls (4.2% (SD = 20.0)) than for unrelated controls (4.9% (SD = 25.7)). We found statistically significant correlations in PMD between cases (n = 228) and sister controls (n = 228) (r = 0.39 (95% CI: 0.28, 0.50; P < 0.0001)), but not between cases and unrelated controls (n = 228) (r = 0.04 (95% CI: -0.09, 0.17; P = 0.51)). After adjusting for other risk factors, square root transformed PMD was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer when comparing cases to sister controls (adjusted odds ratio (inter-quintile odds ratio (IQOR) = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.20, 4.00) or to unrelated controls (adjusted IQOR = 2.62, 95% CI = 1.62, 4.25). Conclusions: The use of sister controls in case-control studies of PMD resulted in a modest attenuation of case-control differences and risk estimates, but showed a statistically significant association with risk and allowed control for race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status and family history.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Boyd NF, 1998, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V7, P1133
[2]   Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer [J].
Boyd, NF ;
Dite, GS ;
Stone, J ;
Gunasekara, A ;
English, DR ;
McCredie, MRE ;
Giles, GG ;
Tritchler, D ;
Chiarelli, A ;
Yaffe, MJ ;
Hopper, JL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (12) :886-894
[3]   Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer [J].
Boyd, Norman F. ;
Guo, Helen ;
Martin, Lisa J. ;
Sun, Limei ;
Stone, Jennifer ;
Fishell, Eve ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Hislop, Greg ;
Chiarelli, Anna ;
Minkin, Salomon ;
Yaffe, Martin J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (03) :227-236
[4]   Body size, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk [J].
Boyd, Norman F. ;
Martin, Lisa J. ;
Sun, Limei ;
Guo, Helen ;
Chiarelli, Anna ;
Hislop, Greg ;
Yaffe, Martin ;
Minkini, Salomon .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2006, 15 (11) :2086-2092
[5]   THE QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS OF MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITIES [J].
BYNG, JW ;
BOYD, NF ;
FISHELL, E ;
JONG, RA ;
YAFFE, MJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 39 (10) :1629-1638
[6]   Varying levels of family history of breast cancer in relation to mammographic breast density (United States) [J].
Crest, Anthony B. ;
Aiello, Erin J. ;
Anderson, Melissa L. ;
Buist, Diana S. M. .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2006, 17 (06) :843-850
[7]   A genome-wide linkage study of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer [J].
Greenwood, Celia M. T. ;
Paterson, Andrew D. ;
Linton, Linda ;
Andrulis, Irene L. ;
Apicella, Carmel ;
Dimitromanolakis, Apostolos ;
Kriukov, Valentina ;
Martin, Lisa J. ;
Salleh, Ayesha ;
Samiltchuk, Elena ;
Parekh, Rashmi V. ;
Southey, Melissa C. ;
John, Esther M. ;
Hopper, John L. ;
Boyd, Norman F. ;
Rommens, Johanna M. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 13 (06)
[8]   Mammographic density in a multiethnic cohort [J].
Habel, Laurel A. ;
Capra, Angela M. ;
Oestreicher, Nina ;
Greendale, Gail A. ;
Cauley, Jane A. ;
Bromberger, Joyce ;
Crandall, Carolyn J. ;
Gold, Ellen B. ;
Modugno, Francesmary ;
Salane, Martine ;
Quesenberry, Charles ;
Sternfeld, Barbara .
MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MENOPAUSE SOCIETY, 2007, 14 (05) :891-899
[9]   The Breast Cancer Family Registry: an infrastructure for cooperative multinational, interdisciplinary and translational studies of the genetic epidemiology of breast cancer [J].
John, EM ;
Hopper, JL ;
Beck, JC ;
Knight, JA ;
Neuhausen, SL ;
Senie, RT ;
Ziogas, A ;
Andrulis, IL ;
Anton-Culver, H ;
Boyd, N ;
Buys, SS ;
Daly, MB ;
O'Malley, FP ;
Santella, RM ;
Southey, MC ;
Venne, VL ;
Venter, DJ ;
West, DW ;
Whittemore, AS ;
Seminara, D .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 6 (04) :R375-R389
[10]   X-RAY CHARACTERIZATION OF NORMAL AND NEOPLASTIC BREAST TISSUES [J].
JOHNS, PC ;
YAFFE, MJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1987, 32 (06) :675-695