PRIVATE INFORMATION AND INSURANCE REJECTIONS

被引:95
作者
Hendren, Nathaniel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Dept Econ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
Private information; adverse selection; insurance; UK ANNUITY MARKET; ADVERSE SELECTION; ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION; EQUILIBRIUM;
D O I
10.3982/ECTA10931
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Across a wide set of nongroup insurance markets, applicants are rejected based on observable, often high-risk, characteristics. This paper argues that private information, held by the potential applicant pool, explains rejections. I formulate this argument by developing and testing a model in which agents may have private information about their risk. I first derive a new no-trade result that theoretically explains how private information could cause rejections. I then develop a new empirical methodology to test whether this no-trade condition can explain rejections. The methodology uses subjective probability elicitations as noisy measures of agents' beliefs. I apply this approach to three nongroup markets: long-term care, disability, and life insurance. Consistent with the predictions of the theory, in all three settings I find significant amounts of private information held by those who would be rejected; I find generally more private information for those who would be rejected relative to those who can purchase insurance, and I show it is enough private information to explain a complete absence of trade for those who would be rejected. The results suggest that private information prevents the existence of large segments of these three major insurance markets.
引用
收藏
页码:1713 / 1762
页数:50
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   MARKET FOR LEMONS - QUALITY UNCERTAINTY AND MARKET MECHANISM [J].
AKERLOF, GA .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1970, 84 (03) :488-500
[2]  
American Councilof Life Insurers, 2010, LIF INS FACT BOOK 20
[3]   Testing when a parameter is on the boundary of the maintained hypothesis [J].
Andrews, DWK .
ECONOMETRICA, 2001, 69 (03) :683-734
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Financing Long-Term Care for the Elderly
[5]   EQUIVALENT COMPARISONS OF EXPERIMENTS [J].
BLACKWELL, D .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1953, 24 (02) :265-272
[6]  
Blackwell D, 1951, P 2 BERK S MATH STAT, V2, P93
[7]   The welfare implications of increasing disability insurance benefit generosity [J].
Bound, J ;
Cullen, JB ;
Nichols, A ;
Schmidt, L .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2004, 88 (12) :2487-2514
[8]   The interaction of public and private insurance: Medicaid and the long-term care insurance market [J].
Brown, Jeffrey R. ;
Finkelstein, Amy .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (03) :1083-1102
[9]   An empirical examination of information barriers to trade in insurance [J].
Cawley, J ;
Philipson, T .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 89 (04) :827-846
[10]   Optimal insurance with adverse selection [J].
Chade, Hector ;
Schlee, Edward .
THEORETICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 7 (03) :571-607