Transition from estrogen therapy to raloxifene in postmenopausal women: effects on treatment satisfaction and the endometrium - a pilot study

被引:38
作者
Davis, SR
O'Neill, SM
Eden, J
Baber, R
Ekangaki, A
Stocks, JM
Thiebaud, D
机构
[1] Jean Hailes Fdn, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Betty Byrne Henderson Ctr, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Royal Hosp Women, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Royal N Shore Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Eli Lilly, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MENOPAUSE SOCIETY | 2004年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
postmenopausal; estrogen; raloxifene; transition; satisfaction; quality of life;
D O I
10.1097/01.GME.0000087981.28957.CF
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the effects of transferring from low-dose, transdermal estrogen to raloxifene with a phase of alternate-day raloxifene therapy with or without low-dose transdermal estrogen on patient satisfaction, endometrial changes, and overall safety in healthy, postmenopausal women previously administered hormone therapy. Design: Healthy postmenopausal women were randomized to one of two treatment groups: raloxifene + low-dose, transdermal estrogen (RLX+E) and raloxifene + placebo (RLX+P). The study consisted of four equal phases of 8 weeks each: Phase I (low-dose, transdermal estrogen, 25 mug/day), phase 11 (double-blind, alternate-day raloxifene 60 mg + low-dose, transdermal estrogen or placebo patch), phase III (alternate-day RLX 60 mg + placebo patch), and phase IV (raloxifene 60 mg/day + placebo patch). Primary endpoints included patient satisfaction, endometrial changes, overall safety, and quality of life. Results: Sixty women were randomized in this study. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two treatment groups. For the primary analysis (phase 11 to phase IV, inclusive), there were no significant differences between the therapy sequences for patient satisfaction, endometrial thickness, or quality of life. In the therapy comparison phase (phase 11), mean change in patient satisfaction score was 3.2 mm (SD = 16.2) for RLX+E and -17.1 min (SD = 38.7) for RLX+P (P = 0.003), whereas mean change in endometrial thickness was 0.8 mm (SD = 2.7) for RLX+E and -0.9 mm (SD = 1.5) for RLX+P (P = 0.021). The RLX+P group showed a significantly greater increase in vasomotor events, with a mean score change of 1.7 (SD = 1.9) compared with a mean score change of 0.2 (SD = 1.8) in the RLX+E group (P = 0.005). There were no statistically significant differences between the two therapy groups in the reporting of treatment-emergent adverse events. Conclusion: Gradual conversion to raloxifene from low-dose estrogen, with a progression from 60 mg every alternate day to 60 mg/day, is a viable option in potentially symptomatic, postmenopausal women.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 175
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Raloxifene and cardiovascular events in osteoporotic postmenopausal women - Four-year results from the MORE (Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation) randomized trial
    Barrett-Connor, E
    Grady, D
    Sashegyi, A
    Anderson, PW
    Cox, DA
    Hoszowski, K
    Rautaharju, P
    Harper, KD
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (07): : 847 - 857
  • [2] Continued breast cancer risk reduction in postmenopausal women treated with raloxifene: 4-year results from the MORE trial
    Cauley, JA
    Norton, L
    Lippman, ME
    Eckert, S
    Krueger, KA
    Purdie, DW
    Farrerons, J
    Karasik, A
    Mellstrom, D
    Ng, KW
    Stepan, JJ
    Powles, TJ
    Morrow, M
    Costa, A
    Silfen, SL
    Walls, EL
    Schmitt, H
    Muchmore, DB
    Jordan, VC
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2001, 65 (02) : 125 - 134
  • [3] Characterization of hot flashes reported by healthy postmenopausal women receiving raloxifene or placebo during osteoporosis prevention trials
    Cohen, FJ
    Lu, YL
    [J]. MATURITAS, 2000, 34 (01) : 65 - 73
  • [4] COMPSTON JE, 1994, REPROD MED REV, V3, P209
  • [5] The effect of raloxifene on risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women - Results from the MORE randomized trial
    Cummings, SR
    Eckert, S
    Krueger, KA
    Grady, D
    Powles, TJ
    Cauley, JA
    Norton, L
    Nickelsen, T
    Bjarnason, NH
    Morrow, M
    Lippman, ME
    Black, D
    Glusman, JE
    Costa, A
    Jordan, VC
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 281 (23): : 2189 - 2197
  • [6] Adverse events reported by postmenopausal women in controlled trials with raloxifene
    Davies, GC
    Huster, WJ
    Lu, YL
    Plouffe, L
    Lakshmanan, M
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 93 (04) : 558 - 565
  • [7] Effects of raloxifene on bone mineral density, serum cholesterol concentrations, and uterine endometrium in postmenopausal women
    Delmas, PD
    Bjarnason, NH
    Mitlak, BH
    Ravoux, AC
    Shah, AS
    Huster, WJ
    Draper, M
    Christiansen, C
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 337 (23) : 1641 - 1647
  • [8] Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene -: Results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial
    Ettinger, B
    Black, DM
    Mitlak, BH
    Knickerbocker, RK
    Nickelsen, T
    Genant, HK
    Christiansen, C
    Delmas, PD
    Zanchetta, JR
    Stakkestad, J
    Glüer, CC
    Krueger, K
    Cohen, FJ
    Eckert, S
    Ensrud, KE
    Avioli, LV
    Lips, P
    Cummings, SR
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (07): : 637 - 645
  • [9] A 12-month comparative study of raloxifene, estrogen, and placebo on the postmenopausal endometrium
    Goldstein, SR
    Scheele, WH
    Rajagopalan, SK
    Wilkie, JL
    Walsh, BW
    Parsons, AK
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (01) : 95 - 103
  • [10] Cardiovascular disease outcomes during 6.8 years of hormone therapy - Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study follow-up (HERS II)
    Grady, D
    Herrington, D
    Bittner, V
    Blumenthal, R
    Davidson, M
    Hlatky, M
    Hsia, J
    Hulley, S
    Herd, A
    Khan, S
    Newby, LK
    Waters, D
    Vittinghoff, E
    Wenger, N
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (01): : 49 - 57