Patient and Plan Spending after State Specialty-Drug Out-of-Pocket Spending Caps

被引:11
|
作者
Yeung, Kai [1 ,2 ]
Barthold, Douglas [2 ]
Dusetzina, Stacie B. [3 ,4 ]
Basu, Anirban [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente Washington Hlth Res Inst, Metropolitan Pk E,1730 Minor Ave,Rm 1600, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Comparat Hlth Outcomes Policy & Econ CHOICE Inst, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Policy, Nashville, TN 37212 USA
[4] Vanderbilt Ingram Canc Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
[5] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
来源
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE | 2020年 / 383卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJMsa1910366
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundSpecialty drugs are used to treat complex or life-threatening conditions, often at high financial costs to both patients and health plans. Three states - Delaware, Louisiana, and Maryland - passed legislation to cap out-of-pocket payments for specialty drugs at $150 per prescription. A concern is that these caps could shift costs to health plans, increasing insurance premiums. Estimates of the effect of the caps on patient and health-plan spending could inform future policies. MethodsWe analyzed a sample that included 27,161 persons under 65 years of age who had rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, hepatitis C, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, Crohn's disease, or ulcerative colitis and who were in commercial health plans from 2011 through 2016 that were administered by three large nationwide insurers. The primary outcome was the change in out-of-pocket spending among specialty-drug users who were in the 95th percentile for spending on specialty drugs. Other outcomes were changes in mean out-of-pocket and health-plan spending for specialty drugs, nonspecialty drugs, and nondrug health care and utilization of specialty drugs. We compared outcomes in the three states that enacted caps with neighboring control states that did not, 3 years before and up to 3 years after enactment of the spending cap. ResultsCaps were associated with an adjusted change in out-of-pocket costs of -$351 (95% confidence interval, -554 to -148) per specialty-drug user per month, representing a 32% reduction in spending, among users in the 95th percentile of spending on specialty drugs. This finding was supported by multiple sensitivity analyses. Caps were not associated with changes in other outcomes. ConclusionsCaps for spending on specialty drugs were associated with substantial reductions in spending on specialty drugs among patients with the highest out-of-pocket costs, without detectable increases in health-plan spending, a proxy for future insurance premiums. (Funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health Data for Action Program.) Treatments for diseases such as hepatitis C and rheumatoid arthritis are effective but expensive. Three states passed legislation to cap patients' out-of-pocket spending for specialty drugs at $150 per prescription. The caps were associated with reductions in out-of-pocket specialty-drug spending among patients with the highest costs, without an increase in overall plan spending.
引用
收藏
页码:558 / 566
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Out-of-pocket health spending by poor beneficiaries (in the South Korea)
    Kim, H
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2003, 43 : 289 - 289
  • [42] Out-of-pocket spending among a cohort of Australians living with gout
    Nathan, Nicholas
    Nguyen, Amy D.
    Stocker, Sophie
    Laba, Tracey-Lea
    Baysari, Melissa T.
    Day, Richard O.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2021, 24 (03) : 327 - 334
  • [43] Distribution of lifetime nursing home use and of out-of-pocket spending
    Hurd, Michael D.
    Michaud, Pierre-Carl
    Rohwedder, Susann
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2017, 114 (37) : 9838 - 9842
  • [44] A Research Note on Transitions in Out-of-Pocket Spending on Dental Services
    Manski, Richard J.
    Moeller, John F.
    Chen, Haiyan
    Hyde, Jody Schimmel
    Pepper, John V.
    St Clair, Patricia A.
    RESEARCH ON AGING, 2015, 37 (06) : 646 - 666
  • [45] EARLY IMPACTS OF THE ACA ON OUT-OF-POCKET AND INSURANCE PREMIUM SPENDING
    Goldman, Anna
    Woolhandler, Stephanie
    Himmelstein, David
    Bor, David
    McCormick, Danny
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 32 : S171 - S171
  • [46] Out-of-pocket health spending: the case of Chile, 1997 and 2007
    Cid Pedraza, Camilo
    Prieto Toledo, Lorena
    REVISTA PANAMERICANA DE SALUD PUBLICA-PAN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 31 (04): : 310 - 316
  • [47] Out-of-pocket (OOP) spending burden for Medicare beneficiaries with cancer
    Ke, X.
    Hendrick, F.
    Shaffer, T.
    Davidoff, A. J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (15)
  • [48] Racial and Ethnic Differences in Out-of-Pocket Spending for Maternity Care
    Gourevitch, Rebecca A.
    Cohen, Jessica L.
    Shakley, Tara
    Orona, Katie Camacho
    Park, Sung Min
    Landrum, Mary Beth
    Rosenthal, Meredith B.
    Friedberg, Mark W.
    Sinaiko, Anna D.
    JAMA HEALTH FORUM, 2025, 6 (02):
  • [49] Out-Of-Pocket Health care Spending by the Chronically Ill in Chile
    Correa-Burrows, Paulina
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ECONOMICS (ICOAE), 2012, 1 : 88 - 97
  • [50] Out-of-Pocket Spending on Common Operations Among the Commercially Insured
    Chhabra, Karan R.
    Scott, John W.
    Yang, Jie
    Fan, Zhaohui
    Dimick, Justin B.
    Telem, Dana A.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2022, 275 (06) : 1078 - 1079