Clinical efficacy of hydrodistention with joint manipulation under interscalene block compared with intra-articular corticosteroid injection for frozen shoulder: a prospective randomized controlled study

被引:42
作者
Mun, Sang Won [1 ]
Baek, Chang Hee [1 ]
机构
[1] Yeosu Baek Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 50,Yeoseo 1, Yeosu Si, Jeollanam, South Korea
关键词
Hydrodistention; interscalene block; manipulation; corticosteroid injection; frozen shoulder; adhesive capsulitis; IDIOPATHIC ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS; PAINFUL STIFF SHOULDER; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PHYSICAL THERAPY; DISTENSION; ANESTHESIA; MANAGEMENT; HYDRODILATATION; ARTHROGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.021
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Hydrodistention is known to be an effective method of treatment for frozen shoulder. However, hydrodistention is accompanied by severe pain during the procedure. An interscalene block may relieve the severe pain associated with the procedure of hydrodistention. This study compared the clinical efficacy of hydrodistention with joint manipulation under an interscalene block with that of intra-articular corticosteroid injection. Methods: This prospective randomized controlled study included 121 patients presenting with frozen shoulder. Patients were randomized into 2 groups; those in group A (60 patients) were treated by hydrodistention with joint manipulation under an interscalene block, and those in group B (61 patients) were managed with intra-articular corticosteroid injection. Pain intensity and patient satisfaction were assessed by the visual analog scale. Functional outcomes were assessed by the Constant score and the range of shoulder motion. Results: Group A demonstrated better patient satisfaction and earlier restoration of range of motion than group B at 6 weeks (P <= .001). At 12 weeks, the pain score was lower and the Constant score was better in group A than in group B. However, at 12 months after treatment, pain score (P = .717), patient satisfaction (P = .832), range of motion (P > .05), and Constant score (P = .480) were similar in the 2 groups. Conclusion: Hydrodistention combined with joint manipulation under an interscalene block provided earlier pain relief and restoration of shoulder range of motion and function compared with single intra-articular corticosteroid injection in patients with primary frozen shoulder. (C) 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1937 / 1943
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   TREATMENT OF RIGID SHOULDERS BY JOINT DISTENSION DURING ARTHROGRAPHY [J].
ANDREN, L ;
LUNDBERG, BJ .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1965, 36 (01) :45-&
[2]  
Arslan S, 2001, RHEUMATOL INT, V21, P20
[3]  
BINDER A, 1986, BRIT J RHEUMATOL, V25, P288
[4]   Arthrographic joint distension with saline and steroid improves function and reduces pain in patients with painful stiff shoulder: Results of a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial [J].
Buchbinder, R ;
Green, S ;
Forbes, A ;
Hall, S ;
Lawler, G .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2004, 63 (03) :302-309
[5]   Arthrographic distension for adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) [J].
Buchbinder, R. ;
Green, S. ;
Youd, J. M. ;
Johnston, R., V ;
Cumpston, M. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2008, (01)
[6]   FROZEN SHOULDER - PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL-STUDY WITH AN EVALUATION OF 3 TREATMENT REGIMENS [J].
BULGEN, DY ;
BINDER, AI ;
HAZLEMAN, BL ;
DUTTON, J ;
ROBERTS, S .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1984, 43 (03) :353-360
[7]  
CORBEIL V, 1992, J CAN ASSOC RADIOL, V43, P127
[8]   Manipulation under anesthesia for primary frozen shoulder: Effect on early recovery and return to activity [J].
Dodenhoff, RM ;
Levy, O ;
Wilson, A ;
Copeland, SA .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2000, 9 (01) :23-26
[9]  
Fareed DO, 1989, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V242, P177
[10]   Manipulation for frozen shoulder: Long-term results [J].
Farrell, CM ;
Sperling, JW ;
Cofield, RH .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2005, 14 (05) :480-484