Understanding Information System Agility - The Example of Business Intelligence

被引:10
作者
Knabke, Tobias [1 ]
Olbrich, Sebastian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Duisburg Essen, Duisburg, Germany
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 46TH ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES | 2013年
关键词
DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE-DEVELOPMENT; STATE; TECHNOLOGY; FRAMEWORK; SUCCESS; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1109/HICSS.2013.581
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
To achieve strategic advantage in today's turbulent environments, it is crucial for organizations to draw increasingly faster conclusions out of changing circumstances. As most decisions today are based on data collected by Information Systems (IS), the IS itself must become more adaptable. This is particularly challenging in the domain of Business Intelligence (BI) Systems since the underlying architectural approach of enterprise-wide decision support systems is not build upon agility, but on reliability and robustness over a period of time. In order to determine the agility of BI, a unique understanding of agility and its underlying criteria is required. This paper provides a literature review which aims to summarize the known criteria from IS literature that can be applied to the domain of BI. The results can be interpreted as a framework for understanding the agility of BI systems and form the basis for generating mandatory criteria for assessing agility.
引用
收藏
页码:3817 / 3826
页数:10
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] Abbasi A, 2008, MIS QUART, V32, P811
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1997, BUSINESS OBJECT DESI, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4471-0947-1_11
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, Agile software development
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, AGILE ANAL VALUE DRI
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2009, GARTN SAYS ORG CAN S
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2007, P 40 ANN HAW INT C S
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2013, The Data Warehouse Toolkit
  • [8] [Anonymous], TRENDS 2011 BUSINESS
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2005, C SYST ENG RES STEV
  • [10] Key organizational factors in data warehouse architecture selection
    Ariyachandra, Thilini
    Watson, Hugh
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2010, 49 (02) : 200 - 212